Can you make a solution under standard conditions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the complexities of measuring thermodynamic properties of solutions, particularly under standard conditions. It emphasizes that standard states for solutes and solvents are defined as pure substances, which complicates the measurement of properties like standard half-cell voltages and enthalpy changes. The standard state is considered a hypothetical reference point, often derived from idealized conditions, such as the behavior of ideal gases. To measure properties like the standard enthalpy of dissolving sucrose in water, one must conceptualize an imaginary solution where the solute behaves as if it were infinitely dilute, allowing its activity to equal one. Practical measurement involves using specialized calorimeters to determine the heat of solution while accounting for various corrections, such as volume changes and heat from the bulb breakage. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the need for careful experimental design to extrapolate standard state properties from measured data, acknowledging the inherent idealizations in these calculations.
Confusus
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is coming from junior-level physical chemistry.

Lots of thermodynamic properties of reactions involving solutions are tabulated under standard conditions; I'm particularly thinking of standard half-cell voltages, but any property will do.

How do you make, say, a sodium chloride solution under those conditions?

My best understanding is that you can't. The definition of the standard state of both solute and solvent specifies (1) the pure solvent, which isn't in the sample, and (2) the solute with some hypothetical properties in the infinitely-dilute limit (as determined by the Henry's law constant).

So if my understanding here is correct, what does a standard state property involving solutions even mean? How would you make the solution(s) and measure that property?
---
To be a little more concrete, think about it in terms of the equation for chemical potential: \mu_i = \mu_i^° + RT \ln a_i
to get standard conditions the solute must have activity = 1. The formula for activity breaks down to a_i = \gamma_i c_i/c^°
Its common to say "the standard concentration c° = 1 M" but you see in this equation that the nonideality plays a role in the activity coefficient, making the activity NOT unity, and the chemical potential not the standard value.

So what's going on?
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The standard state is a reference state, and is typically considered to be a hypothetical one that is arrived upon after taking the limit of a certain parameter. For example, the IUPAC definition of standard states includes that, for gases, the standard state of a gas is determined as if it is an ideal gas, which as we know is an approximation to the behavior of real gases.

So, practically speaking, you want to measure the properties of a number of solutions where one varies one of the parameters in order to extrapolate/calculate the standard state. As the aspiring comedians will note, the goal is to keep you from dividing by zero in any calculation one may ever have to do.
 
Thanks Mike H, that was a good reminder of something I knew/should have known. I get confused thinking about it each time it comes up.

Can you be a little more concrete? Let's say I wanted to measure the standard enthalpy change of dissolving sucrose in water. The standard states of pure water and pure sucrose are straight-forward. But the solution, what is its "standard state"? If I have this right, it is an imaginary sample where you have pure water in one beaker and an imaginary solution that obeys Henry's law (as if the solute were infinitely dilute) which defines its activity coefficient but at Molarity of the reciprocal of its activity coefficient, so that the solute has activity=1.

I still have a hard time wrapping my head around what series of experiments would lead to measuring the standard enthalpy of solution of sucrose, even if just in the limit of several related experiments as concentration changes.

Can anyone make that last point more clear?

Thanks again, Mike H
 
I'm not sure just how "concrete" a hypothetical state can be, given that one arrives at it by calculation, so I'm not sure if I can help out there without confusing the matter even more. As I said, it's an idealized notion which is intended to serve as a baseline of sorts when doing thermodynamic calculations. For example, the standard state quantities one sees in a standard general chemistry or physical chemistry textbook are most likely the ones at 298.15 K and 101.325 kPa (or thereabouts) - someone doing work in geochemistry is probably going to need the standard state quantities for salts at much higher temperatures & pressures.

But I can tell you how people measure these standard state thermodynamic quantities. To take your example of measuring enthalpies of solution...

There are these fairly cool calorimeters that let you place a known amount of compound in a bulb, submerse the bulb in solvent, and then trigger the bulb's breakage, and then the compound dissolves, and one measures the heat of solution from the compound dissolving in your solvent. One needs to correct for the volume change of the bulb breaking, any heat evolved from the bulb breakage, the change in vapor pressure, and so on. But once you've measured the heat of solution at your chosen concentrations, one can then calculate the enthalpy of solution.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top