MHB Can You Name 9 Important Precalculus Topics for a Strong Foundation in Calculus?

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
If you were to make a list of 10 important precalculus topics that students should know very well, what would they be?
Let me start by saying word problems. All students going into Calculus 1 should be able to answer Algebra 1 and 2 applications. Can you name 9 other important precalculus topics? I would like to have a list of 10, if possible.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
If you were to make a list of 10 important precalculus topics that students should know very well, what would they be?
Let me start by saying word problems. All students going into Calculus 1 should be able to answer Algebra 1 and 2 applications. Can you name 9 other important precalculus topics? I would like to have a list of 10, if possible.

Algebra, Algebra, and more Algebra - including Theory of Algebra and so-called "College Algebra". If you can't Complete the Square to derive the Quadratic Formula, you haven't done nearly enough. If you can't QUICKLY plot a line on a Cartesian Coordinate system or write the equation of a line in four or five different ways, practice some more.

Geometry - Constructions, Theorems. Nothing better for knowing what makes sense and what doesn't. This WILL organize your brain.

Analytic Geometry, but not just Conic Sections. Throw in Rational Functions (They may be part of "College Algebra", I suppose.) Functions in general. Two-dimensional spatial orientation will save you.

Trigonometry - More than you think. Memorize. Manipulate. Get a good handle on it. Don't forget Polar Coordinates!

To a lesser extent - Matrices and Linear Algebra. This will help you foresee some things that will be important and cause you to wonder about systems, rather than just individual functions.

To a lesser extent - A broad classification of "Discrete Mathematics" and "Finite Mathematics". This can be an odd collection of things. There is more going on, here, than you might think.

To a lesser extent - Static Physics. Some general idea of some of the applications of the calculus will serve you well. This will help you appreciate calculus-based physics.

To a lesser extent - Financial Mathematics, Theory of Interest. If nothing else, this should warm you up to Geometric Series. This will also prep you for early applications of differential equations. This will also force you to be more organized.

To a lesser extent - Number Theory. If nothing else, like Geometry, this will make you use your brain in a way with which you may not be accustomed. it will broaden your horizons.

Sorry, only made it to 9, but my classifications were not all that distinct. Some are downright muddled. Anyway, if you nail down these things - make them second nature - you can spend your time on the calculus, rather than on reviewing what should have been listed as prerequisite.
 
tkhunny said:
Algebra, Algebra, and more Algebra - including Theory of Algebra and so-called "College Algebra". If you can't Complete the Square to derive the Quadratic Formula, you haven't done nearly enough. If you can't QUICKLY plot a line on a Cartesian Coordinate system or write the equation of a line in four or five different ways, practice some more.

Geometry - Constructions, Theorems. Nothing better for knowing what makes sense and what doesn't. This WILL organize your brain.

Analytic Geometry, but not just Conic Sections. Throw in Rational Functions (They may be part of "College Algebra", I suppose.) Functions in general. Two-dimensional spatial orientation will save you.

Trigonometry - More than you think. Memorize. Manipulate. Get a good handle on it. Don't forget Polar Coordinates!

To a lesser extent - Matrices and Linear Algebra. This will help you foresee some things that will be important and cause you to wonder about systems, rather than just individual functions.

To a lesser extent - A broad classification of "Discrete Mathematics" and "Finite Mathematics". This can be an odd collection of things. There is more going on, here, than you might think.

To a lesser extent - Static Physics. Some general idea of some of the applications of the calculus will serve you well. This will help you appreciate calculus-based physics.

To a lesser extent - Financial Mathematics, Theory of Interest. If nothing else, this should warm you up to Geometric Series. This will also prep you for early applications of differential equations. This will also force you to be more organized.

To a lesser extent - Number Theory. If nothing else, like Geometry, this will make you use your brain in a way with which you may not be accustomed. it will broaden your horizons.

Sorry, only made it to 9, but my classifications were not all that distinct. Some are downright muddled. Anyway, if you nail down these things - make them second nature - you can spend your time on the calculus, rather than on reviewing what should have been listed as prerequisite.

Good and informative reply.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top