Can you please tell me if this question is Correct?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shen07
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function u(x,y) = e3x((3y-2)cos(3y)-2xsin(3y)) is not holomorphic in C, as it fails to satisfy the conditions for harmonicity. The discussion confirms that the correct approach is to determine whether u(x,y) is harmonic rather than holomorphic. The function does not satisfy Laplace's Equation, indicating it is not harmonic. The corrected form of the function should be u(x,y) = e3x((3y-2)cos(3y)-3xsin(3y), which is harmonic and represents the real part of the complex potential f(z) = -(3iz+2)e3z.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic functions and Laplace's Equation
  • Knowledge of complex analysis, specifically holomorphic functions
  • Familiarity with the concept of complex potentials
  • Basic proficiency in calculus and differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of harmonic functions and their relation to Laplace's Equation
  • Learn about holomorphic functions and the Cauchy-Riemann equations
  • Explore complex potentials and their applications in fluid dynamics
  • Investigate the implications of misprints in mathematical functions and their corrections
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of harmonic and holomorphic functions.

shen07
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
"Show that u(x,y) = e3x((3y-2)cos(3y)-2xsin(3y)) is holomorphic in C.

Hence Find the complex Potential f(z) such that u(x,y)=Re(f(x+iy))."

Well i think it should be harmonic because we cannot show that Re(z) is holomorphic and hence find its Complex Potential, just want you to confirm that with me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shen07 said:
"Show that u(x,y) = e3x((3y-2)cos(3y)-2xsin(3y)) is holomorphic in C.

Hence Find the complex Potential f(z) such that u(x,y)=Re(f(x+iy))."

Well i think it should be harmonic because we cannot show that Re(z) is holomorphic and hence find its Complex Potential, just want you to confirm that with me.
I agree with you. A real-valued function cannot be holomorphic (unless it is constant). The question should be asking whether u(x,y) is harmonic, not holomorphic.
 
Opalg said:
I agree with you. A real-valued function cannot be holomorphic (unless it is constant). The question should be asking whether u(x,y) is harmonic, not holomorphic.
Ok. Thanks..But the function also is not right then? because LaPlace's Equation does not hold from that function..
 
shen07 said:
"Show that u(x,y) = e3x((3y-2)cos(3y)-2xsin(3y)) is holomorphic in C.

Hence Find the complex Potential f(z) such that u(x,y)=Re(f(x+iy))."

Well i think it should be harmonic because we cannot show that Re(z) is holomorphic and hence find its Complex Potential, just want you to confirm that with me.

shen07 said:
Ok. Thanks..But the function also is not right then? because LaPlace's Equation does not hold from that function..
You're right again! As it stands, that function is not harmonic. Perhaps the last 2 is a misprint for a 3. Then $u(x,y) = e^{3x}\bigl((3y-2)\cos(3y)-\mathbf{3}x\sin(3y)\bigr)$ is harmonic, being the real part of $-(3iz+2)e^{3z}.$
 
Opalg said:
You're right again! As it stands, that function is not harmonic. Perhaps the last 2 is a misprint for a 3. Then $u(x,y) = e^{3x}\bigl((3y-2)\cos(3y)-\mathbf{3}x\sin(3y)\bigr)$ is harmonic, being the real part of $-(3iz+2)e^{3z}.$

Hey Thanks a lot for that, i would have passed hours to find that error, I am really greatful to you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
957
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K