Can you prove that 1+1=2 or is it an axiom?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Unredeemed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axiom
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether "1+1=2" can be proven or is merely an axiom. Participants reference Peano axioms to illustrate that "2" can be defined as S(S(0)), where S represents the successor function. The argument suggests that using the definition of addition, one can derive "1 + 1 = 2" through logical steps. However, some participants argue that this is more of a definition than a proof in a traditional sense. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards viewing "1 + 1 = 2" as a definitional truth rather than a provable theorem.
Unredeemed
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
Can you prove that 1+1=2 or is it an axiom?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Well, use peano axioms. Look it up yourself! :smile:
 


Unredeemed said:
Can you prove that 1+1=2 or is it an axiom?
Most commonly, that (or something very similar) is taken as the definition of the symbol '2'.
 


Unknot said:
Well, use peano axioms. Look it up yourself! :smile:

Could you say that:

x+1=S(x)

and, therefore
1+1=S(1)
S(1)=2

Would that work as a proof?
 


I wouldn't call that a proof, unless you were proving it a la Russell/Whitehead.

As Hurkyl said, it probably is a definition more than anything else. 2 is the number next to 1.
 


Okay, thanks :)
 


I consider S(S(0)) to be the definition of "2". As such, "1 + 1 = 2" unpacks as "S(0) + S(0) = S(S(0))". From the definition of addition, S(0) + S(0) is S(S(0) + 0). Also from the definition of addition, S(0) + 0 is S(0). Thus S(0) + S(0) = S(S(0)) and so 1 + 1 = 2.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top