Can You Solve This Equation? A Collection of Math Jokes and Sayings

  • Thread starter Thread starter MC363A
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around seeking help for math-related jokes and sayings for an upcoming project. Participants share their enjoyment of previously encountered jokes and express a willingness to contribute their own. A specific limerick is mentioned, incorporating a math equation in a humorous context. The humor is emphasized through a playful scenario involving two characters in a bar using math-related curse words. The thread highlights the community's engagement in sharing and creating math humor.
MC363A
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
If anyone out there can help me with coming up with some great math-related jokes or sayings, it would be very appriciated. There is a rather large project comming up, and I haven't started yet, but I will also post the ones I find if you are willing to help. I have heard a lot of great ones, but now I am kicking myself for not writing them down.
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A google search brought me here. I didn't read them all (yet), but some of the ones I read were pretty funny (even the ones I've heard before). Is any of this along the lines you're looking for? BTW, I think your signature is hilarious.
 
This one is my favorite.

A limerick.
((12+144+20+(3*4^{1/2})))/7)+(5*11)=9^2+0
Do you know what it says to make it a limerick?
 
Two guys go into a bar, and well, they say curse words in math using a calculator. Isn't that funny as hell?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top