Cancer Mutations: Visible or Invisible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alliereid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cancer Invisible
AI Thread Summary
Cancer mutations can vary in visibility and type, with some mutations being silent point mutations that do not alter the protein produced, while others may be missense or nonsense mutations, as well as deletions or insertions. These mutations can lead to the development of oncogenes, disrupting the normal regulation of cell division and contributing to cancer. Although all cancer mutations eventually become visible, they may not be detectable initially. Various cancer screening tests are available, but it is advised to consult a doctor or specialist for concerns. Screening for every individual mutation is generally not practical, as mutations are common and not all lead to significant cancer development.
alliereid
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
And what type would that mutation be?

Would it be correct to say that cancer mutations are not always visible, and one could run tests to see if the person has cancer?
 
Biology news on Phys.org


I assume you mean phenotypically? If so, it would be a silent point mutation. In this, a single nucleotide is replaced by another but, the sequence will still code for the same amino acid, and as such the protein will not change.

Genotypically, it could be one of several types of mutations. It could be a missense point mutation, or a nonsense point mutation. In addition, it could be a deletion or insertion. Any of these can cause the cells to develop into oncogenes, in which the cells ability to know when to stop dividing ceases; which is in itself, cancer.

All cancer mutations are visible at some point, though it can take many years for it to become visible, so I would assume that not all cancer mutations are visible initially but, will become visible eventually.

As for cancer screening, there are many tests out there to test for many different types of cancer. If this is something concerning you, you'd best see your doctor or a specialist.
 


Mutations are a constant and would very very rarely be expected to establish a significant cancerous state. Screening for each mutation event would not be useful.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top