Cannon Velocity after firing Cannonball

  • Thread starter Thread starter HarleyM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cannon Velocity
AI Thread Summary
A stationary cannon weighing 2000 kg fires a 25 kg cannonball at 250 m/s, prompting a discussion on calculating the cannon's recoil velocity. The conservation of momentum principle is applied, leading to the equation (25)(250) + (2000)(0) = (2000 + 25)V', resulting in a recoil velocity of approximately 3.086 m/s. Some participants clarify the reasoning behind using 2025 in the calculations, emphasizing the importance of understanding momentum conservation. The discussion highlights the need for clear explanations to aid comprehension, especially in educational contexts. Overall, the calculations confirm that the cannon moves backward with a velocity consistent with momentum conservation principles.
HarleyM
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A stationary 2000 Kg cannon fires a 25 kg cannonball horizontally at 250 m/s. Find the velocity of the cannon after firing the cannonball . You may assume friction is negligible.


Homework Equations



M1V1+M2V2=(M1+M2)V'



The Attempt at a Solution



(25)(250)+ (2000)(0)= (2000+25)V'
V'=(25)(250)/(2025)
V'=3.086 m/s

I just need confirmation as I am not 100% positive with my physics... thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why 2025?
I would write:
momentum before shot = momentum after shot
0 = mv + MV
0 = 25*250 + 2000*V
 
The total momentum of the situation before the firing is zero. This means that after the firing, the total must remain at zero. Find the momentum of the cannonball once it has been fired. The cannon must have equal momentum in the opposite direction for momentum to be conserved at zero kgm/s

i.e:

Before: (2000*0)+(25*0) = 0

After: (2000*V)-(25*250) = 0, or 2000V = 6250

Taking the cannons velocity to be positive, and the motion of the cannonball in the other direction to be negative. Should be trivial to solve from there (3.125 m/s).
 
Delphi51 said:
Why 2025?
I would write:
momentum before shot = momentum after shot
0 = mv + MV
0 = 25*250 + 2000*V

LOL because my understanding of momentum is limited.. this makes much more sense and gives a velocity backwards which is consistent.

Thanks!
 
Most welcome! It pays to write the general principle down, perhaps highly abbreviated, to orient yourself and your readers. I used to be too brief but had to change when I became a school teacher. Students couldn't understand unless I wrote the whole story.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top