Canonical and conjugate momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter igraviton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjugate Momentum
AI Thread Summary
Canonical momentum and conjugate momentum are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings in classical mechanics. Canonical momentum is defined as the derivative of the action with respect to the time derivative of a generalized coordinate, while conjugate momentum specifically refers to the momentum associated with a particular coordinate. The relationship between generalized coordinates and their conjugate momenta is expressed through the Poisson bracket, where {q,p}=1. The physical significance of canonical momentum depends on the interpretation of the corresponding generalized coordinate. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the foundations of classical mechanics.
igraviton
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
what is the difference between canonical and conjugate momentum.. ? what is its physical significant.. I was reading classical mechanics by Goldstein but could understood this terms
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Exactly the same thing. You might use the term conjugate momentum when you're referring to the canonical momentum which is conjugate to a particular coordinate.
 
Hi Bill_k,

Thanks for reply but what that means ? "conjugate to a particular coordinate"... physical intrepretation
 
The canonical conjugate momentum p is derived via a derivative of the action w.r.t. the time derivative of a generalized coordinate q. Then {q,p}=1. The physical interpretation of p depends on the interpretation of q.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top