Carnot Cycle: Isothermal Expansion Phase - Work Done?

AI Thread Summary
In the isothermal expansion phase of a Carnot cycle, the work done by the engine on the environment is equal to the energy extracted from the hot reservoir, as the temperature remains constant. The heat flow into the gas corresponds directly to the work done, since the change in internal energy is zero. The work done can be calculated as the area under the PV graph for this phase, which follows the equation P = K/V. This results in the work being expressed as nRTln(Vi/Vf). Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping the mechanics of the Carnot cycle.
G01
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,704
Reaction score
19
Hi. I have a qualitative question about the work done from state 1 to state 2 of a Carnot cycle. This is the Isothermal Expansion Phase. Is work done by the engine on the environment during THIS PHASE ONLY equal to the energy extracted from the hot reservoir to keep the temperature constant. I feel that it should be less. Is my reasoning incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
G01 said:
Hi. I have a qualitative question about the work done from state 1 to state 2 of a Carnot cycle. This is the Isothermal Expansion Phase. Is work done by the engine on the environment during THIS PHASE ONLY equal to the energy extracted from the hot reservoir to keep the temperature constant. I feel that it should be less. Is my reasoning incorrect?
Yes.

Since the temperature does not change, the heat flow into the gas is equal to the work done: (\Delta Q = \Delta U + \Delta W = \Delta U + \int PdV; Since \Delta U = 0, \Delta Q = \int PdV)

The work done is the area under the PV graph for the isothermal expansion phase. Since the isotherm is T = PV/nR = constant, it is of the form P = K/V where K is constant = nRT. The area under that graph (\int PdV = K\int dV/V) is nRTln(Vi/Vf).

AM
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot Andrew. Man I love having this website:smile:
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top