Can't prove generalized De Morgan's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter john562
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    generalized Law
john562
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let B be a non-empty set, and supose that {Sa : a\inB} is an B- indexed family of subsets of a set S. Then we have,
(\cup a\in B Sa)c = \bigcap<sub>a\in B</sub> Sac.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to show that the two were both subsets of each other, but I'm not sure how to do that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose a\in \bigcap S_\alpha^c. Then a is in all the sets S_\alpha ^c, and so it is not contained in any of S_\alpha. Therefore, it is not contained in their union (by definition). It is therefore contained in union's complement.

Suppose a is in union's complement. No S_\alpha contains a, so all the S_\alpha^c's contain a. Therefore, a is in their intersection.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top