Can't Seem To Get It Right: Solving Centripetal Acceleration Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem involving centripetal and tangential acceleration for a car on a circular track. The user initially believes they are applying the correct equations but struggles to find the right time when centripetal acceleration equals tangential acceleration. They correctly identify the tangential acceleration and radius but mistakenly use the circular motion period equation instead of kinematics. A participant clarifies that the user should apply rotational kinematics to determine the correct time. The user acknowledges the mistake and thanks the participant for the guidance.
scavok
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
What I'm doing seems like it should work, but I can't seem to get it right. I'm sure I'm doing the math right, but I have a feeling I'm answering something that's not being asked. I would just like some help on setting up the equation right.

A car starts from rest on a flat circular track of radius 200.1 m and accelerates tangentially at a rate of 4.79 m/s2. How much time elapses before the centripetal acceleration of the car is equal in magnitude to the tangential acceleration.

I have the tangential acceleration (at), and radius (r).
Using the centripetal acceleration equation ac=v2/r, I set ac=4.79 m/s2, r=200.1m, and solve for the velocity.

I then use the circular motion period equation (v=(2*pi*r)/t), plug in the velocity I just calculated, the radius of the track, and solve for time.

I get 40.61s everytime, which is incorrect.

vv I got it now. Thanks for saving my hair.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
that's not the right equation; you should be using kinematics/rotational kinematics to find the time that it accelerates. The T in that equation is for period.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top