Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Can't we use dq/dt in RC discharge?

  1. Apr 9, 2017 #1
    In the derivation of discharging RC circuit, you use I = -dq/dt to get Q = Q0 e-t/RC

    But isn't dq/dt already implied to be negative, since charge on the capacitor is decreasing, and you force it to be negative using initial nd final conditions? So the final state is some low charge q, and the inital state is high charge Q.

    Doing it this way gives Q = Q0 et/RC

    I can see that as t increases, the charge Q increases as well. It's the opposite of what I know it should be and I know it has to do with using I = -dq/dt, but I can't see WHY we use -dq/dt when dq/dt is already negative.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 9, 2017 #2

    cnh1995

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    For a discharging capacitor,
    I=Ioe-t/RC.
    This equation already takes care of the decaying nature of the current (and the charge).
    Use I=dq/dt and integrate to get
     
  4. Apr 9, 2017 #3

    Ssnow

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

  5. Apr 9, 2017 #4

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Charge flow and charge flow per second (I) are both proportional to charge and in the same direction in the circuit (yes I know that is obvious but. . . .) For an equation of the form
    A=A0et/RC to apply , where A is some other quantity associated with the circuit, A would have to be inversely proportional to Q (or I), to account for the lack of a minus sign. (And apparent unlimited growth with time)
    e-c = 1/ec
    Just to re-state the obvious. So it has to be down to your Maths I think.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Can't we use dq/dt in RC discharge?
  1. Why we can't hear ? (Replies: 3)

Loading...