Capabilities of International Linear Collider and the Tesla Cavities

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the International Linear Collider (ILC) and the Tesla cavities, specifically the performance metrics of a 9-cell cavity operating at 222 kW RF and 1.3 GHz with a beam current of 8.5 mA. The main inquiry is about the required RF field strength if the number of cells is doubled from 9 to 18 while maintaining constant power output. To achieve the same electron energy at the output with increased cavity cells, adjustments to the RF field strength must be calculated. The conversation highlights the technical considerations in scaling the ILC's cavity design. Understanding these parameters is crucial for optimizing the collider's performance.
pulsemaster
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering about the International Linear Collider and the Tesla Cavities.
okay as i see it they run a 9 cell cavity with a field strength of 222kW RF at 1.3 ghz and a beam current of 8.5 ma.
my question is if they doubled the cavities to 18, what rf field strength would they need to obtain the same energy of electron on the output?
thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
okay you did not laugh at the mistake in my question.

so question is :
if they double the cells in each cavity section from 9 to 18. what rf field strength would they need to obtain the same energy of electron on the output? (power remains constant)
thanks
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top