Capacitor and Potential. EN - weird solution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two homework questions regarding work done in capacitor systems, which appear to ask similar things but yield different answers due to the equations used. The first question calculates work using W = -qV, resulting in 10J for moving electrons between capacitor plates. The second question employs the formula W = 1/2 QV, yielding -1J, as it considers the average potential during charging. The confusion stems from the terminology used in the second question, where "charge transfer" and "charging" are both mentioned, leading to ambiguity about the correct approach. It is clarified that the factor of 1/2 arises from the calculus involved in charging a capacitor, and that electron transfer occurs through the circuit rather than directly across the plates.
hulkster1988
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
There are these two homework questions that I think are asking the exact same thing, yet use different equations (and get different answers for them)

First Question 1. Homework Statement

A potential difference of 10V is present between the plates of a capacitor. How much work must be done to move 6.25x10^18 electrons from the negative plate to the positive plate?


Homework Equations



W= -qV

The Attempt at a Solution



Plug in above, answer is (apparently) 10J


Second Question 1. Homework Statement

4 uC of negative charge is transferred from one plate of a 8uF capacitor to the other plate. How much work was done by the electric field in this charging process?


Homework Equations



W= PE stored in capacitor
W= -PE
= 1/2 QV

The Attempt at a Solution



Plug it in, I get -1J

The thing is the above equation is for work stored in the capacitor, and the 1/2 is there because it is the average of V as it is charged from 0 to V.

So why does the first question use the formula for work that is for a charge, q, placed into a field? Shouldn't it to use the 1/2QV formula?

I'm definitely stumped on this one
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand how u get PE in the second case as 1 J using equation PE = 1/2QV, it is possible if capacitance of the capacitor, C = 8pF.

In the charging process of a capacitor charge increases from 0 to Q so 1/2QV equation is valid in the second case . but in the first case charge (Q)transfer occurs against a potential V so workdone shld be QV only

One ambiguity lies in the second question where both "charge transfer" as well as "charging" have been stated. This misleads the concept.
 
Sorry for the second equation, since Q=CV also, it can be substituted into make an equation of PE = Q^2 / 2C.

So are you saying that in the since case there is no V between the capacitors, and thus the 1/2 is used?

ALso, when it says electrons are "transferred", does that mean through the circuit or a direct spark through the plates?

Thanks for the help
 
The factor of 1/2 comes from a derivation of work done to charge a capacitor from 0V using elementary calculus. When a capacitor is charged, the electrons are transferred in the circuit, not across the the dielectric between the plates. We're assuming a perfect dielectric with 0 current leakage between capacitor plates here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top