Capacitor Discharge: Deriving the Correct Expression for Potential Difference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the expression for potential difference across a discharging capacitor in a series circuit with a resistor. The initial attempt incorrectly suggested that the potential difference increases over time, leading to confusion about the correct expression. The correct formula for the potential difference is V_c(t) = V_initial e^(-t/RC), reflecting the capacitor's discharge behavior. The misunderstanding stemmed from the direction of current and voltage change, where the current should be defined as flowing into the capacitor, resulting in a negative rate of change of voltage. Clarification was provided that the defining equation for the capacitor inherently accounts for direction, resolving the confusion.
Ahmedbasil
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You have a capacitor, of capacitance C farads, with charge Q coulombs. It is connected in series with a resistor of resistance R ohms. Derive an expression for the potential difference over the capacitor at any time t.2. Homework Equations and theorems
I_{c} = C\frac{dV_{c}}{dt}
V = IR

*Kirchhoff's voltage law

The Attempt at a Solution


Using KVL:

V_{c} - I_{c} R = 0
V_{c} = RC\frac{dV_{c}}{dt}
\frac{1}{RC} dt = \frac{1}{V_{c}} dV_{c}

then:

V_{c} (t) = V_{initial} e^{\frac{t}{RC}}

where

V_{initial} = \frac{Q}{C}

3. My concern

as t approaches infinity the potential difference over the capacitor also approaches infinity. This is definitely not right - the capacitor is discharging. Every textbook/website I look at comes up with the equation:

V_{c} (t) = V_{initial} e^{\frac{-t}{RC}}

For the life of me I cannot figure out what I'm doing wrong. I know what's supposedly wrong with my solution, but I cannot see the mathematical proof of the minus sign on the power of e.

I'd greatly appreciate any help or insight anyone could give.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a current direction issue. dV/dt will be negative for the capacitor, right? (It's discharging, so its voltage is dropping). But the current in your circuit you've defined to be positive flowing out of the capacitor. So you should start with Ic = -C dVc/dt.
 
I suppose that dVc/dt doesn't direction into account. Why doesn't it though? At first I considered this, but then I dismissed it, knowing that it's perfectly fine to have a rate of change w.r.t another variable negative. The equation should be:

I_{c} = C |\frac{dV_{c}}{dt}|

Anyway, thanks very much for your help.
 
Last edited:
Ahmedbasil said:
I suppose that dVc/dt doesn't direction into account. Why doesn't it though? At first I considered this, but then I dismissed it, knowing that it's perfectly fine to have a rate of change w.r.t another variable negative. The equation should be:

|I| = C |\frac{dV_{c}}{dt}|

Anyway, thanks very much for your help.

The defining equation for the capacitor does take direction into account. In the definition, the current direction is defined to be INTO the capacitor, and resulting voltage change is positive. Thus, when the voltage change is NEGATIVE, the current will come OUT of the capacitor.
 
Owh, okay, I assumed it is the current OUT of the capacitor. I see :). My bad, and thank you very much.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top