Capacitor Problem: Work Done by a Battery in Charging

  • Thread starter Thread starter sahil_time
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the work done by a battery when charging a capacitor in a circuit with no resistance. The initial thought was that the work done equals the energy stored in the capacitor, expressed as 0.5CV^2. However, the correct formula for the work done by the battery is W = QV, which simplifies to W = CV^2. It is clarified that while the energy supplied by the battery is QV, the energy stored in the capacitor is indeed 0.5CV^2, with the other half potentially lost as heat in circuits with resistance. The conversation concludes that energy loss can occur through electromagnetic radiation even in the absence of resistance.
sahil_time
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
I came across a question in my Physics Paper
"What is the work done by a battery in charging a capacitor" (Assume circuit has no resistance).

This is what i thought...
The Energy in the field between the capacitor plates is 0.5CV^2 where C=capacitance and
V=Battery EMF.So the ans should be 0.5CV^2.

BUT the actual solution in paper was...
Net Work done=Net Charge * Voltage
W=QV
W=CV^2 .

What is the correct ans?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy supplied by the battery is E = QV and Q=CV to get E=CV2

the energy stored by the capacitor is E=½ CV2 (if I remember correctly, the other ½ is lost as heat).
 
rock.freak667 said:
The energy supplied by the battery is E = QV and Q=CV to get E=CV2

the energy stored by the capacitor is E=½ CV2 (if I remember correctly, the other ½ is lost as heat).

It can't be lost as heat...without resistance!
 
The energy supplied by the battery is Q x V. The energy stored on the Capacitor is 0.5Q x V.
Energy can be lost by
1) Resistance in the connecting wires
2) Sparking when the switch is closed
3) Electro-magnetic radiation from the connecting wires as the charging current flows. The flowing charge is a changing current and a changing current produces electro-magnetic (radio) radiation
In the absence of 1) and 2) there is always 3)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top