Capacitors in Series: Intuitive Understanding Question

AI Thread Summary
When capacitors are connected in series, the total capacitance is less than any individual capacitor due to the way they share voltage and store energy. This is analogous to resistors in series, where total resistance increases, while in parallel, both capacitors and resistors behave oppositely. The intuitive understanding can be enhanced by considering energy storage; capacitors in parallel increase total capacitance by effectively enlarging the plate area, while in series, the combined impedance leads to a reduction in total capacitance. The relationship between impedance and capacitance further clarifies this, as the total impedance in series is the sum of individual impedances. Understanding these principles helps clarify why adding more capacitors in series results in lower overall capacitance.
matangi7
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I understand algebraically that when capacitors are in series, the total capacitance is less than any individual capacitance, but I do not understand this intuitively. How can this be possible? Shouldn't more capacitors equal more capacitance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
matangi7 said:
I understand algebraically that when capacitors are in series, the total capacitance is less than any individual capacitance, but I do not understand this intuitively. How can this be possible? Shouldn't more capacitors equal more capacitance?
That's exactly like saying that more resistors should mean more resistance, but when they are in parallel it is actually LESS resistance, it's only more resistance when they are in series. Similarly, capacitors in parallel means more capacitance and in series means less.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
matangi7 said:
I understand algebraically that when capacitors are in series, the total capacitance is less than any individual capacitance, but I do not understand this intuitively.
Maybe the energy approach could make it intuitive for you. Compare the total energies stored in two capacitors in both series and parallel connections, keeping the source voltage constant. Which one gives more stored energy?
 
It's easiest to understand capacitors in parallel. The capacitance of a single capacitor is proportional to the area of the plates so putting two capacitors is a bit like increasing the area of the plates of a single capacitor. It's slightly more complicated if the capacitors aren't identical but the general idea is that in parallel the capacitances add together.

As for series.. Capacitors have an impedance (Z). If you haven't studied impedance yet then think of it a bit like resistance for AC signals. It actually depends on the frequency of the AC signal but perhaps not worry about that for the moment. The impedance of a capacitor is inversely proportional to the capacitance (eg 1/C) so the larger the capacitance the lower the impedance and the better it conducts an AC signal. When putting two capacitors in series the total impedance is the sum of the two individual impedances so Zt = Z1 + Z2. In terms of capacitance that becomes 1/Ct = I/C1 + 1/C2.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top