Capacitors , why cant series combination be used in an open circuit?

AI Thread Summary
In an open circuit, series capacitors cannot be combined using the standard formula because the initial charge required for accurate voltage calculations is not determined. While the equivalent capacitance can be calculated using the formula 1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2, this alone does not provide the correct voltage across the capacitors when the circuit is closed. The initial charge must be recalculated to ensure it aligns with the problem's voltage requirements. For example, the equivalent capacitance may be 1.2μF, but the charge must be correctly computed to avoid discrepancies in voltage. Accurate calculations are essential for proper circuit analysis.
K Dhiraj Bhak
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Capacitors , why can't series combination be used in an open circuit??

they say we cannot apply series combination formula for the capacitors in an open circuit,,,but why?? why can't we find the equivalent capacitance in an open circuit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what do you mean " in an open circuit "
show us a drawing of what you are referring to

cheers
Dave
 
I refer you to the last part of this reply on that thread..

NascentOxygen said:
Certainly you can combine them. Regardless of all else, if they are in series then it's always true that 1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2

That gives you the capacitance that behaves equivalently, but you have yet to determine the initial charge it should have so as to lead to identical circuit current & voltage when the switch gets closed.

In short.. You can find the equivalent capacitance BUT you also need to find the correct equivalent charge.

Hint: You cannot just add the two charges together. If you do that the initial voltage will be wrong. The equivalent capacitance it 1.2uF. You calculated the charge to be 660μC so the initial voltage would be 660μC/1.2uF = 550V. That's wrong, it should be 100+180=280V according to the problem statement. Recalculate the correct charge.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top