Car Crash Scenario Math: Is 114285 Pa Too High?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simulating a car crash scenario, where a user calculates pressure and acceleration for an 80 kg passenger in a vehicle traveling at 20 m/s. The calculated pressure of 114285 pascals and an acceleration of 300 m/s^2 raised concerns about their validity, as they seemed excessively high. Comparisons were made to human body pressure under different conditions, suggesting that the calculated values might not be as alarming when considering body elasticity and movement during impact. Additionally, a correction was noted regarding the acceleration unit, indicating a possible error in the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of accurately modeling human responses in crash scenarios.
Frank_Horrigan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi I am trying to simulate a car crash scenario mathematically and come up with reasonable numbers for a project. The problem is I do the calculations and everything seems mathematically correct but the numbers seem weird.

I simulated an 80 kg passanger in a car crash that was going 20 m/s and the car has crumple zones of .5 m, the seatbelts streatch 20 cm, and the airbag+seatbelt area on the driver is .2 m^2

After doing the calculations I got numbers which seem high but I don't know, considering this is a pretty fast crash here.

I got pressure on the driver of 114285 pascals, with an acceleration of about 300 m/s.

Area these numbers ridiculously high and I did something wrong, or do they seem about right considering the scenario?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if one takes the area of the ball of your foot to be four centimeters by four centimeters you get a pressure of about 500 kPa if you stand on one foot (it is probably even smaller than this estimate). Your pressure is about 100 kPa, which is one fith of the pressure when a person stands one one foot. So this pressure you are stating is quite low by comparison.
 
Hidden factor

You may also not be considering the natural elasticity of the human body.
http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/safety/images/chest-impact.jpg
Take, for example, the ability of the limbs to extend outward (forward) in a collision. Because the torso of a human body makes up for only about 40-50% of someone's weight (that's a generous estimate), that allows for a considerable amount of mass to continue moving even after the chest is stopped.

The head rolls forward, the arms extend out, the legs push forward and outward, and even the hips slide forward... allowing the entire body to compensate for the force of the impulse. It's like being tackled - you don't want to tighten your muscles up because the impact will just hurt more - relax, and your body has more time to absorb the force. :smile:

I know those factors are almost impossible to account for when performing calculations (since you don't have a crash test dummy of your very own... if you do, you are a very lucky guy). But hopefully that may shine some light on your too-high acceleration problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
supplemental

Frank_Horrigan said:
I got pressure on the driver of 114285 pascals, with an acceleration of about 300 m/s.

FYI, 300 m/s is a measure of velocity (you meant m/s^2?)
Also, your numbers don't quite match up - did you drop an exponent somewhere in your calculations?

Atmospheric pressure: 1 atm = 101325 pascals = 101.325 kPa
Acceleration: 300 m/s^2 = 30.6 G's
...just to give your numbers some context.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top