Car Wheels Automatically Recenter

  • Thread starter Thread starter EFuzzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Wheels
AI Thread Summary
Car wheels naturally recenter due to a phenomenon called caster, where the contact patch of the tire is positioned behind the pivot axis. This design creates a torque that steers the tire into the direction of the force acting on it, helping the wheels return to a forward position. When a car turns, side forces at the contact patch generate this torque, similar to how shopping cart wheels behave. If the axle were vertical instead of angled, the caster effect would diminish significantly. Understanding caster is crucial for grasping how vehicle steering dynamics work.
EFuzzy
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone,

My friend and I were having a discussion of why car wheels would naturally return back to a forward position if one doesn't hold on to the steering wheel. It could be that its just the car turning to match the direction of the wheel, but I think the wheels turn more to match the direction of the car (it could be an illusion).

From what I understand, turning works because the wheel microscopically slips on the pavement in the direction of the current car movement, but since the wheel is spinning, the kinetic friction only acts normal to the wheel, causing a circular acceleration. This model doesn't explain where the torque comes from that causes the wheel to turn back to forward however. Could someone explain where this (possibly non-existent) phenomenon comes from?

Thanks,
Efuzzy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's called caster. The contact patch is behind where the pivot axis would intercept the pavement. Any side force at the contact patch results in a torque force that steers the tire into the force. So if a car is turning right, there's a side force to the right, causing the front tires to steer left. It's easy to see this effect with the wheels of a shopping cart.
 
Oh thanks, that explains it. So if the axle was pointed straight up instead of at an angle, would the caster disappear?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top