Car Wheels Automatically Recenter

  • Thread starter Thread starter EFuzzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Wheels
AI Thread Summary
Car wheels naturally recenter due to a phenomenon called caster, where the contact patch of the tire is positioned behind the pivot axis. This design creates a torque that steers the tire into the direction of the force acting on it, helping the wheels return to a forward position. When a car turns, side forces at the contact patch generate this torque, similar to how shopping cart wheels behave. If the axle were vertical instead of angled, the caster effect would diminish significantly. Understanding caster is crucial for grasping how vehicle steering dynamics work.
EFuzzy
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone,

My friend and I were having a discussion of why car wheels would naturally return back to a forward position if one doesn't hold on to the steering wheel. It could be that its just the car turning to match the direction of the wheel, but I think the wheels turn more to match the direction of the car (it could be an illusion).

From what I understand, turning works because the wheel microscopically slips on the pavement in the direction of the current car movement, but since the wheel is spinning, the kinetic friction only acts normal to the wheel, causing a circular acceleration. This model doesn't explain where the torque comes from that causes the wheel to turn back to forward however. Could someone explain where this (possibly non-existent) phenomenon comes from?

Thanks,
Efuzzy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's called caster. The contact patch is behind where the pivot axis would intercept the pavement. Any side force at the contact patch results in a torque force that steers the tire into the force. So if a car is turning right, there's a side force to the right, causing the front tires to steer left. It's easy to see this effect with the wheels of a shopping cart.
 
Oh thanks, that explains it. So if the axle was pointed straight up instead of at an angle, would the caster disappear?
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top