Cart on an inclined ramp, with rebound

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 500 g cart released from rest on a 30° frictionless ramp, which bounces off a rubber block. The calculations involve determining the cart's velocity before and after the collision using principles of kinematics and impulse. The final correct rebound distance up the ramp is derived using the equation \(d = \frac{v_i^2}{2g \sin(\theta)}\), leading to a distance of approximately 0.5 m, correcting earlier miscalculations. The key takeaway is the importance of accurately applying impulse and kinematic equations to solve rebound problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic kinematics, including velocity and acceleration equations.
  • Familiarity with impulse-momentum theorem and its application.
  • Knowledge of gravitational forces and their components on inclined planes.
  • Ability to perform calculations involving trigonometric functions, specifically sine.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the impulse-momentum theorem in detail, focusing on inelastic collisions.
  • Learn about kinematic equations for motion on inclined planes, particularly under gravity.
  • Explore the concept of energy conservation in collision scenarios.
  • Investigate the effects of different angles of inclination on the motion of objects.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for practical examples of kinematics and impulse in real-world scenarios.

Goldenwind
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Cart on an inclined ramp, with rebound

A 500 g cart is released from rest 1.0 m from the bottom of a frictionless, 30° ramp. The cart rolls down the ramp and bounces off a rubber block at the bottom. The figure (below) shows the force during the collision.

After the cart bounces, how far does it roll back up the ramp?

knight_Figure_09_30.jpg



It'd be cool if we could get this solved relatively soon. It's due at midnight EST. And no, I'm not going to be a jerk if it's not solved by then, it's my fault for leaving it late :)
In theory, I have this solved, but I've made a mistake somewhere as it says my answer is wrong. This is what I did:

m = 500g = 0.5kg
x = 1.0m
\theta = 30°

Starting from rest, the cart travels 1.0m at the acceleration of gravity (Altered by the incline of the ramp).
v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2ad

Assuming that downwards is the negative direction, therefore v_f and g will be negative.
If the incline was 90°, the cart would freefall.
If the incline was 0°, the cart wouldn't be affected by gravity at all.
Therefore, we need a coefficient on g. Since sin(90) = 1 (Full gravity) and sin(0) = 0 (No effect), we use sin(30) = 0.5 to make this alteration.
v_f = \sqrt{0 + 2ad}
v_f = -\sqrt{2(sin(30)g)d}

sin(30) = 0.5, which cancels out the 2. g = 9.8, and d = 1.0 so can be ignored.
v_f = -\sqrt{g} = -3.1305
This is the speed of the cart immediately before it hits the rubber block.


Next, J = F\Delta t = \Delta P
F\Delta t = 200 * \frac{26.7}{1000} = 5.34 Ns
5.34 Ns = \Delta P = | mv_0 - mv_f |
Where v_0, v_f are the velocities immediately before and after rebounding, respectively.

The velocity before rebounding, v_0[/tex], we just calculated to be -3.1305 (The v_f of rolling down the ramp).<br /> <br /> 5.34 Ns = | 0.5 * -3.1305 - 0.5 * v_f |<br /> 5.34 Ns = | -1.56525 - 0.5*v_f |<br /> For the absolute value to equal 5.34, what is inside of the absolute bars must be 5.34, or -5.34. The only way for it to become 5.34 is if v_f is large enough to bring -1.56525 above positive, and into 5.34 (Meaning v_f would need to be somewhere around 12m/s, which doesn&#039;t make sense, as that would imply it actually gained speed in rebounding).<br /> <br /> So, we assume the absolute bars to be equal to -5.34, and solve v_f accordingly.<br /> -5.34 Ns = -1.56525 - 0.5*v_f<br /> v_f = \frac{-5.34 + 1.56525}{0.5}<br /> v_f = -7.55<br /> Since v_f is a rebound up the incline, it is taken to be a positive value, 7.55m/s.<br /> This is also above our initial collision value of 3.13, which also isn&#039;t possible, so my mistake is probably before this point.<br /> <br /> However, just to solve the problem (And to show how to do so):<br /> v_0, v_f now respectively represent the velocity just as you begin your rebound, and the velocity just as you finish your rebound (Once gravity has slowed the cart back down to 0m/s, before it begins falling down the ramp again)<br /> v_f = v_i + at<br /> 0 = 7.55 + (-sin(30)gt)<br /> 7.55 = 0.5*9.8t<br /> t = 1.54 sec<br /> <br /> And lastly, finding out how far the cart can recoil in 1.54 seconds, with an initial speed of 7.55m/s and a gravitational force of -sin(30)g on it.<br /> d = \frac{v_i + v_f}{2} * t<br /> d = \frac{7.55 + 0}{2} * 1.54<br /> d = 5.82m<br /> <br /> By the grading system, I&#039;m told this answer is wrong. This makes sense too, as it shouldn&#039;t rebound farther than it initially started. My error is most likely in calculating the 7.55m/s.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Goldenwind said:
v_f = -\sqrt{g} = -3.1305
This is the speed of the cart immediately before it hits the rubber block.

This is fine.

Next, J = F\Delta t = \Delta P
F\Delta t = 200 * \frac{26.7}{1000} = 5.34 Ns
5.34 Ns = \Delta P = | mv_0 - mv_f |
Where v_0, v_f are the velocities immediately before and after rebounding, respectively.

Your basic concept of the impulse appears correct. Now, look at the shape of the force profile during the collision. One way of dealing with this is to ask what is the average magnitude of the force during the 26.7 msec collision and then multiply that average by the collision duration. Another way is to find the total area of the force profile during the collision, which gives the magnitude of the impulse (if you've had calculus, we'd say that the integral of F(t) with respect to time equal J).

I'm not entirely clear what the question(s) is/are that you are to answer, but take things from there.
 
Posted all that, and forgot to post the question, sorry.
Edited original post to show the question.

Tried the thing with a different value for J (Dividing old value by 2, since the area is a triangle), still got a wrong answer.
 
OK, I guess we're also agreed now that the impulse is given by

Goldenwind said:
Next, J = F\Delta t = \Delta P
F\Delta t = 200 * \frac{13.35}{1000} = 2.67 Ns
2.67 Ns = \Delta P = | mv_0 - mv_f |
Where v_0, v_f are the velocities immediately before and after rebounding, respectively.

The velocity before rebounding, v_0[/tex], we just calculated to be -3.1305 (The v_f of rolling down the ramp).
<br /> <br /> <br /> If we divide the impulse by the mass of the cart, we get a velocity change of<br /> <br /> (2.67 kg-m/sec) / 0.5 kg = 5.34 m/sec .<br /> <br /> Since the cart was headed downhill at 3.13 m/sec just before impact, the velocity of the cart after the collision is<br /> <br /> -3.13 m/sec + 5.34 m/sec = +2.21 m/sec (so plainly the collision with the bumper is inelastic).<br /> <br /> I&#039;d avoid using the absolute value since that leads to ambiguous solutions, one of which is unphysical. The important point is that if we call the cart&#039;s velocity negative before contact, the force from the bumper being positive means that the acceleration on the cart is positive and thus directed uphill. So a positive velocity change would be added to a negative velocity, giving here a positive (uphill) velocity after contact.<br /> <br /> I&#039;m taking it from the method you used to finish the problem that you&#039;ve had kinematics, but not energy yet. Have you had the &quot;velocity-squared&quot; equation? (You are using a version of it here: v_f = \sqrt{0 + 2ad}). The acceleration back up the slope is -g sin 30º , as you remarked earlier, the initial speed is now 2.21 m/sec and the final speed will be zero. So we have<br /> <br /> (v_f)^2 = (v_i)^2 + 2ad giving<br /> <br /> 0 = (2.21 m/sec)^2 + 2 · (-4.91 m/(sec^2)) · d ,<br /> <br /> d being the distance the cart runs back up the slope.<br /> <br /> <br /> As I look at your step involving absolute values, I believe the value you&#039;d want to use is<br /> <br /> 2.67 Ns = -1.56525 - 0.5*v_f , rather than -2.67 N·sec . (As I say, my preference is to avoid absolute value expressions and to look instead at directions of the velocities and directions of the changes.)
 
Last edited:
Went through your advice, computed some things, tried it, and it was correct. Thank-you :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K