Cartesian and polar coordinates - integrals

Click For Summary
When converting integrals from Cartesian to polar coordinates, an extra factor of "r" is necessary when integrating with respect to dr and dθ to maintain dimensional consistency, as r represents a length. In contrast, when substituting dydz with dθ dz, the need for an additional r is less clear, but it is generally required to ensure proper dimensionality. The discussion emphasizes that the differential volume in cylindrical coordinates is represented as r dr dθ dz, highlighting the importance of the radius in these calculations. It is noted that without multiplying by r, the integration may not accurately represent the area or volume being calculated. Understanding these relationships is crucial for correctly applying integrals in different coordinate systems.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When dealing with an integral integrated with respect to dxdy, I can convert this to polar coordinates, and then integrate with respect to dr d\theta. But I have to multiply with a "r" before integrating.

If I am dealing with an integral with respect to dydz, I can substitute this with d\theta dz, but not have to multiply with "r". Why is that? (And is what I wrote even correct?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
- or do I have to multiply with "r" (being the radius, btw) every time, but when it's d\theta dz, I just insert the value for r, but when it's drd\theta, I have to integrate it?
 
Hi Niles!

I'm not sure what your y and z are …

But anyway, if you think about the dimensions, x y z and r (and dx dy and dz) are all lengths, but theta (and dtheta) is only a number.

So, to keep everything the right dimensions, you'll always need an extra r for every theta or dtheta, to make it a length.

(That's not a proof, of course … just a useful check when you're not sure you have the right formula!)
 
The area of the rectangle between x,y and x+dx,y+dy is dx*dy. The area of a the region from r,theta to r+dr,theta+dtheta is r*dr*dtheta. So if you are integrating a function over an area, that's where the extra r comes from.
 
Niles said:

Homework Statement


When dealing with an integral integrated with respect to dxdy, I can convert this to polar coordinates, and then integrate with respect to dr d\theta. But I have to multiply with a "r" before integrating.

If I am dealing with an integral with respect to dydz, I can substitute this with d\theta dz, but not have to multiply with "r". Why is that? (And is what I wrote even correct?)
I seriously doubt that yo can "substitute d\thetadz" without multiplying by r but I don't understand what coordinates you are using. In converting from Cartesian, x, y, z, coordinates to cylindrical r, \theta, z the "differential of volume is r dr d\theta dz. The only kind of integral I can think of that would involve "d\theta would be on the surface of a cylinder. And even then, you would multiply by the radius of the cylinder. That is because lines of constant \theta grow farther apart as r increases.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K