Calculating Christoffell Symbols of Second Kind for Cartesian Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter zheng89120
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Space
zheng89120
Messages
139
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let a surface be define by z = x^(a=3) = f[x^(a=1,2)]

Show that the Christoffell sybols of the 2nd kind are:

[Christoffell symbol]^abc = { fafbc }/ { f^\alpha f_sub_\alpha }

where indices on f indicates partial derivatives

Homework Equations



(d^2 x/dt^2)^\alpha + [Christoffell symbol]^\alphaBC (dx/dt)^B (dx/dt)^C = 0

compare with:

Euler-Lagrangian Equation

The Attempt at a Solution



E-L equatiion: x** - m dz*/dx* = -g dz/dx

compare with the first relevant equation...

how? what is x*^B and x*^C in the first equation
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
have you got an online version of the question or picture because it is hard to make sense of this thing
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/59383047@N05/5436668502/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
you have a 2d metric that only depends on the derivatives of f . You can derive it to be

g = \begin{pmatrix}<br /> <br /> 1+(\partial_1 f)^2 &amp; \partial_1 f \partial_2 f \\<br /> \partial_1 f \partial_2 f &amp; 1+(\partial_2 f)^2 \end{pmatrix}

or in component form and using your notation

g_{ab} = \delta_{ab} +f_a f_b

then you can use the standard formula for the Christoffel symbols

\Gamma^{a}_{bc} = \frac{1}{2} g^{ad} (\partial_c g_{bd} +\partial_b g_{cd} - \partial_d g_{bc} )

the inverse metric is a bit harder to write down in component form but it is possible
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top