I Cartesian velocity and generalized velocity

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a query regarding a specific notation in "A Student's Guide to Lagrangians and Hamiltonians" by Patrick Hamill, specifically whether to use ##\delta_{kj}## instead of ##\delta_{ij}## in the context of generalized velocity. Participants agree that the notation should indeed be ##\delta_{kj}##. The conversation is brief, with a focus on clarifying this point in the text. The consensus reinforces the importance of accurate notation in understanding the material. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for precision in mathematical expressions within the book.
beowulf.geata
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm reading A Student's Guide to Lagrangians and Hamiltonians by Patrick Hamill and, in the following section on generalized velocity, I'm wondering if we should have ##\delta_{kj}## rather than ##\delta_{ij}##?

7.jpg


8.jpg


Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
beowulf.geata said:
Hi,

I'm reading A Student's Guide to Lagrangians and Hamiltonians by Patrick Hamill and, in the following section on generalized velocity, I'm wondering if we should have ##\delta_{kj}## rather than ##\delta_{ij}##?
Looks like it.
 
PeroK said:
Looks like it.
Many thanks!
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...

Similar threads