Casimir effect - Does it fit? Or NOT?

eemaestro
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I just heard about the Casimir effect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_effect

Is this for real? Or is it just speculation?
If it's real, then how in the name of science does it fit into the four fundamental forces?!
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/forces/funfor.html

I think it's just a fancy name for friction. I think friction is an example of electromagnetic force, same
as the pressure of standing on the floor. But I could be wrong! The pressure of standing on the floor could be a result of gravity! So which is it? EM or Gravity ? Or both?! We can't even talk about the Casimir effect (if it even exists) until we can clear up something as simple as standing on the floor. :!)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Casimir effect is very real and there have been numerious experiments attesting the existence of that macroscopic force. That's not something new, it can be interesting, but it's a just a mere effect of EM field quantization in various geometries. As for the 4 forces, well they go hand in hand, since the theory of 4 forces is based on (gauge) field quantization which also explains the existence of the Casimir force.
 
Here is page by Ulf Leonhardt explaining how manipulating the Casimir effect may allow advances in the reduction of friction in nano-machines.

http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~ulf/levitation.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the wiki page must be in error, there is no way that this could be true:

Indeed at separations of 10 nm — about a hundred times the typical size of an atom — the Casimir effect produces the equivalent of 1 atmosphere of pressure (101.3 kPa)

1 atm over a separation as large as 100 angstoms? no way
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top