- #36
mheslep
Gold Member
- 364
- 729
See where your'e going but no, don't agree even with that. I speculate that the press is not always out to make US soldiers look bad, and seems to be confused as to when to lay into them or off. I think they're very clear on the administration. Yep, good gotcha story on the administration and grandma gets run over by the news van.CaptainQuasar said:On this point I'm thinking back to during the Iraq invasion when I compared coverage of it between U.S. television, French Canadian television, and the BBC (while in Britain). On the BBC and on the Canadian channels you saw a heck of a lot more wounded Iraqi children and Iraqis running around in the streets and screaming with blood all over them. I saw almost none of that, by comparison, on the U.S. networks - there was lots more footage of press conferences and artillery targeting and firing and steel-jawed Marines gazing out over the desert or being attacked.
The point being, the press here is not always tripping over themselves to make the administration look bad.
Yep. Occasionally listen. Don't care for the local carrier here, never will: few days after 9/11 driving pre-dawn the station DJ went off on a rant about 'how did these moslem guys get flight training? why can't blacks get flight training in AmeriKa...' while the building's were still smoking.Have you ever seen Democracy Now!, that absurdly left-wing, internet-only nightly news broadcast? It's way too boring to watch regularly but they often run fairly significant stories that don't really appear in the mainstream press.⚛
Last edited: