Catching a Falling Can: Solving for Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem where a person must calculate the acceleration needed to catch a falling can while standing at an angle of 75 degrees from the vertical. Key points include the understanding that the acceleration of the falling can is constant at 9.8 m/s², and the mass of the can is irrelevant to the calculations. Participants emphasize the importance of using kinematic equations and the relationship between the distances covered by both the catcher and the can, which must be equal at the moment of catching. The final calculated acceleration required for the catcher to reach the can is approximately 2.63 m/s². The discussion concludes that mass does not factor into the equation, focusing instead on the proportional relationship between distance and acceleration.
Jeramaya
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A friend leans out of an upper window of an apartment building and drops a canned beverage of your choice to you on the sidewalk below. Unfortunately, you aren't directly beneath the window; instead, you are standing where the angle to your friend is 75 degrees above horizontal. Thinking quickly, you start accelerating toward the point where the falling can will reach ground level. Find the constant acceleration of your motion that would allow you to catch the can as you arrive."


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


What I know is that I made up a weight for the can (.75 lbs), which I converted to Newtons (.75lb x 1N/.2248lbs = 3.3N). I know that I weigh 140 lbs, which I converted to 623 Newtons. The falling can has the equation F=ma, so I calculated the mass to be .34kg. The final y-position is zero--the point where I catch the can. The initial velocity in the y-direction for the can, as well as the initial velocity in the x-direction for me, are both zero. Since there is no time or final velocity given, I am really confused as to how to approach this problem. Any help/hints are greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


1. It will probably help you if you draw a diagram of the problem.

2. The acceleration of a falling object, neglecting resistances, is independent of weight. You should look at the basic equations of kinematics, found here.

3. Essentially, the catcher will have to reach the point where the object will hit the ground (ignore the fact that it would be easier to catch at head height, it's probably not taken into consideration for the question) at the same time as the falling object does. So you will have to calculate what distance the catcher is away from that point, and how long the object will take to fall to the ground.

Have a go and see how you do.
 


Don't worry about the mass of the can. Galileo Galilei demonstrated a long time ago that a small connon ball and a big cannon ball dropped from the top of the tower in Pisa both reached the ground at the same moment. Both cannon balls accelerated at g = 9.8metres/sec/sec.
The point is to think about the shape of the triangle linking you, your friend and the spot where you will catch the can. The ratio of the length of the vertical side of the triangle and the length of the horizontal side of the triangle will be numerically the same as the ratio of the acceleration of the can and the acceleration you'll have to make. No forces need to be calculated.
 


OK. So if I take the bottom of the triangle to be side A, and the vertical side of the triangle to be B, I can set it up like this:

Tan 75 degrees = B/A = Accel. of can in y-direction / Accel. of me in x-direction

Then,

Accel. of me in x-direction = Accel. of can in y-direction / Tan 75 degrees
= 9.80m/s/s / Tan 75 degrees = 2.63 m/s/s

Does my mass have nothing to do with the equation then?
 


No. Forget mass.

The equation to consider is one of the kinematic ones for constant acceleration

DistanceCovered = (InitialVelocity*Time) + 0.5*Acceleration*Time*Time

For you and the can, the InitialVelocity is zero, so we can neglect that part of the equation.

For both you and the can, the Time taken is the same. (Otherwise you'll be too early or too late to catch it).

So we find that for both you and the can, the DistanceCovered is proportional to the Acceleration.

I agree with your numerical result.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top