Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) of montmorillonite (the calculation)

AI Thread Summary
To modify pristine montmorillonite (MMT) using cationic surfactants, the calculation of the surfactant's weight is crucial but often unclear. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) of MMT is 92.6 mequiv/100 g, indicating the potential for ion exchange. When preparing organoclay, it is suggested to use an amount of amine surfactant that is twice the CEC value based on the weight of the clay sample. For a 2.5 g sample of Cloisite®Na, the calculation involves determining the equivalent amount of surfactant based on its efficiency compared to ammonium ions. The efficiency of the surfactant may vary, and factors such as the time required for larger surfactant molecules to intercalate into the clay must also be considered. For accurate calculations, it is recommended to explore existing literature on "surfactant pillared clays" for additional insights.
yijing84
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am going to modified the pristine montmorillonite (MMT) by using cationic surfactant.
However I am confusing on the way to calculate the weight of the surfactant.
I have been searching hundred of journals but couldn't get any information on how to calculate it.
For example:

MaterialsThe commercial sodium montmorillonite (Cloisite®Na) used in the present study was supplied by Southern Clay Products, Gonzales, Texas (USA). The cation exchange capacity (CEC) of montmorillonite (MMT) is 92.6 mequiv/100 g as reported by suppliers. The basal spacing of MMT is 12.1 Å. This MMT was used as such without any further purification. Various amines used as cationic surfactant.

Organoclay preparation and characterizationThe required amount of amine (taken as twice the amount required based on CEC of MMT) based on 2.5 g of Cloisite®Na was protonated in 100 ml of 1 N HCl for 1 h at room temperature with vigorous stirring to obtain the ammonium chloride salt.

However, they do not state that how to calculate the required amount of amine based on CEC??
Anyone can help me out in this?
Thank you so much in advance.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Cation exchange capacity is calculated using an ammonium salt. If your surfactant can occupy the anionic sites as easily as ammonium ion, then calculate the amount of surfactant using its formula wt. This example of montmorillonite's CEC is 92.6 milliequivalents per 100g of dry clay. Your amine surfactant is very likely to be less efficient at exchange than the much smaller, more mobile ammonium ion. It is left to you to determine your clay's "surfactant" exchange capacity. The CEC will be the upper bound to what is possible. Also, it takes time for larger species to intercalate into the clay so that factor is also left for you to consider. Google "surfactant pillared clays" to see what others have reported.
 
I had gone through many literature but I still can't figure out how to calculate the amount of surfactant needed.Can anyone show me the calculation please?
My head is going to blow-up because of this...
Thank you so much.
 
yijing84 said:
... based on 2.5 g of Cloisite®Na was protonated in 100 ml of 1 N HCl for 1 h at room temperature...

See here? Your sample size is 2.5 grams. How much amine for such a small sample?

Well, if you chose to use a 100 gram sample, and the CEC of the MMC is 92.6 meq/100 grams, and the instructions tell you to use twice that amount of amine...


Can you take it from here?
 

Thread 'Solubility of MgSO47H2O in water'

It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
View full post »

Thread 'Why does having 8 valence electrons make an element inert?'

I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
View full post »

Similar threads

This will save millions of lives: LifeStraw
Replies
37
Views
8K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top