Proving the Harmonic Property of Analytic Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ultimateguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions
ultimateguy
Messages
122
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The functions u(x,y) and v(x,y) are the real and imaginary parts, respectively, of an analytic function w(z).
Assuming that the required derivatives exist, show that

\bigtriangledown^2 u=\bigtriangledown^2 v=0

Solutions of Laplace's equation such as u(x,y) and v(x,y) are called harmonic functions.


Homework Equations


Cauchy-Riemann conditions:

\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} = \frac{\delta v}{\delta y}
\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} = -\frac{\delta v}{\delta x}


The Attempt at a Solution


I expanded \bigtriangledown^2 u = \frac{\delta u}{\delta x}\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} + \frac{\delta u}{\delta y}\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} and using the Cauchy-Riemann conditions I found

\bigtriangledown^2 u = \frac{\delta v}{\delta y}\frac{\delta v}{\delta y} + \frac{\delta v}{\delta x}\frac{\delta v}{\delta x}=\bigtriangledown^2 v

What I can't figure out how to do is prove that this is equal to zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your eqs. for del^2 are wrong.
\nabla^2 u=\partial_x\partial_x u+\partial_y\partial_y u.
 
Dang, you're right. Can I dot it into an element of length like this?

\bigtriangledown^2 u \bullet d\vec{r}^2 = \frac{\delta}{\delta x}\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} dx^2 + \frac{\delta}{\delta y}\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} dy^2
 
There is a hint in the problem that says I need to construct vectors normal to the curves u(x,y)=c_i and v(x,y)=c_j. Wow, I'm pretty lost.
 
The Cauchy-Riemann equations are
\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}
\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}
which is what you have, allowing for your peculiar use of \delta rather than \partial!

Now just do the obvious: differentiate both sides of the first equation with respect to x and differentiate both sides of the second equation with respect to y and compare them.

Are you sure that the hint is for this particular problem? A normal vector to u(x,y)= c is
\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{j}
and a normal vector to v(x,y)= c is
\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\vec{j}.
Using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, that second equation is
-\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{j}
which tells us the the two families of curves are orthogonal but that does not directly tell us about \nabla^2 u and \nabla^2 v.
 
Thanks for your reply.

There is a part b) to the problem, and it is this:

b) Show that

\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\frac{\partial v}{\partial y} = 0

I solved it easily using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, so I figured that the hint was for the first part.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top