Cauchy's Integral Formula for a Fourth Order Singularity

  • Thread starter Thread starter DavitosanX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Integral
DavitosanX
Messages
9
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



This problem is from Mary L. Boas - Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, Chapter 14, section 3, problem 23.

\oint_C \frac{e^{3z}dz}{(z - ln2)^{4}}

2. Homework Equations


Cauchy's integral formula

The Attempt at a Solution



First isolate the singularity:

\oint_C \frac{e^{3z}dz}{(z - ln2)^{4}} (This should read something like (e^3z/1^4)/(z-ln2)^4) but I can't seem to do it in latex...)

Then let g(z) be:

g(z) = e^{3z}

Since there's a fourth power in the singularity, g(z) must be derived three times:

g'(z) = 3e^{3z}
g''(z) = 9e^{3z}
g'''(z) = 27e^{3z}


To solve the integral, we multiply g'''(z) by:

(2 \pi i)(27e^{(3)(ln2)}) = 432 \pi i

But the book states that the answer is 72 \pi i, which is exactly 6 times less than my answer. Where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
DavitosanX said:

Homework Statement



This problem is from Mary L. Boas - Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, Chapter 14, section 3, problem 23.

\oint_C \frac{e^{3z}dz}{(z - ln2)^{4}}

Homework Equations



Cauchy's integral formula

The Attempt at a Solution



First isolate the singularity:

\oint_C \frac{e^{3z}dz}{(z - ln2)^{4}} (This should read something like (e^3z/1^4)/(z-ln2)^4) but I can't seem to do it in latex...)

Then let g(z) be:

g(z) = e^{3z}

Since there's a fourth power in the singularity, g(z) must be derived three times:
You mean differentiated?

g'(z) = 3e^{3z}
g''(z) = 9e^{3z}
g'''(z) = 27e^{3z}

To solve the integral, we multiply g'''(z) by:

(2 \pi i)(27e^{(3)(ln2)}) = 432 \pi i

But the book states that the answer is 72 \pi i, which is exactly 6 times less than my answer. Where did I go wrong?
To calculate the residue, you have to divide by 1/(n-1)! where n is the order of the pole. It's part of the limit formula for calculating the residue.
 
  • Like
Likes DavitosanX
Thank you very much for your answer.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top