I Causally separated regions in CMB?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter DuckAmuck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    causality cmb
AI Thread Summary
Causally separate regions in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) refer to points that are outside each other's light cones, meaning they cannot influence each other. The minimum distance for such separation is related to the observable universe's size, which is determined by the distance light has traveled since the CMB was emitted. The observable universe appears the same size to all observers, with CMB photons originally emitted from about 42 million light years away, now expanded to over 46 billion light years. This phenomenon raises questions about the thermal equilibrium of the CMB, as it suggests that some regions were out of causal contact during the early universe, leading to the "horizon problem." Inflationary theories aim to address this issue by proposing superluminal expansion to explain the uniformity observed in the CMB.
DuckAmuck
Messages
238
Reaction score
40
So I have heard it mentioned that there are causally separate regions in the CMB. For instance a point A and point B that we can see here on earth, but are outside of each other's light cones. My question is then, how far apart are these points A and B at minimum to be causally separate in this way.

Also, is this the motivation behind superluminal inflation theories?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Keep in mind the observable universe is the exact same size for all observers at any given instant in time. The size of the observable universe is essentially limited to the distance light has had time to travel since CMB photons were emitted. CMB photons we view today were originally emitted at a distance of 42 million light years from Earth - and any other observer in the universe. That distance has since grown to over 46 billion light years for us, as well as any other observer in the universe. The light from remote regions of the universe have barely had enough time to reach earth, much less the opposite side of the universe currently observable from earth. Inflation is mainly motivated by the fact the CMB is in thermal equilibrium. This is difficult to explain if portions of the CMB were out of causal contact in the early universe.
 
A couple of degrees (of angular separation); see pages 10 - 11 of

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/Inflation/Lectures.pdf

The is called "the horizon problem", and it is one of the motivations for inflation.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top