Cavity in a dielectric material

AI Thread Summary
In a dielectric material with a hole, applying a uniform electric field does not result in a null electric field within the hole. The continuity of the normal component of the electric displacement field (D) and the tangent component of the electric field (E) across material boundaries ensures that the electric field is present. While there is no charge inside the hole, the flux entering and exiting the volume results in a non-zero electric field. A suggested approach to understand this is to analyze a one-dimensional problem, such as a three-layer parallel plate capacitor with a void layer. This analysis confirms that an electric field exists in the air gap, demonstrating that the field is not null.
Leonardo Machado
Messages
56
Reaction score
2
Hello friends.

If i have a dieletric material ( w/ a hole) and apply an uniform eletric field on it, the eletric field in the hole will stay null ?

Peace.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, why would one think so? The normal component of ##D=\epsilon(r)E## and the tangent component of ##E## are continuous across dielectric (actually all) material boundaries.
 
  • Like
Likes Leonardo Machado
Paul Colby said:
No, why would one think so? The normal component of ##D=\epsilon(r)E## and the tangent component of ##E## are continuous across dielectric (actually all) material boundaries.

But if i close a surface within the hole, there woud not be any charge inside, so ∫ D ⋅ dS = 0 and D = 0.
 
Leonardo Machado said:
But if i close a surface within the hole, there woud not be any charge inside, so ∫ D ⋅ dS = 0 and D = 0.
Not if as much ##D## flux exits as enters the volume as leaves which is actually the case. My suggestion is work a 1-D problem that's simple to solve completely. Try a 3 layer parallel plate capacitor with a void layer inside where you ignore fringing fields. Continuity of normal ##D## along with the total voltage drop yields an answer. You will find an ##E\ne0## in the air gap.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top