Electron path in the presence of a dielectric

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of an electron in the vicinity of a parallel plate capacitor when a neutral dielectric is introduced near its trajectory. Participants explore whether the presence of the dielectric affects the electron's path and the electric field within the capacitor, considering various configurations and assumptions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that an electron placed near the negative plate of a capacitor will accelerate towards the positive plate in a straight line, assuming no other influences.
  • Others argue that the electron will not reach the positive plate unless certain conditions are met, such as the plates touching or the voltage being sufficient to cause dielectric breakdown.
  • There is a suggestion that the introduction of a neutral dielectric does not prevent the electron from accumulating on the negative plate, as it does not affect the electron's trajectory in vacuum.
  • One participant proposes that the field produced by the dielectric will be parallel to the field from the plates, indicating that it may not affect the electron traveling outside the dielectric.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that the presence of the dielectric can change the electric field inside the capacitor, depending on the permittivity of the dielectric, and that the electric field near the dielectric may bend.
  • A later reply introduces the idea of modeling the electron's path through a cylindrical hole in the dielectric, suggesting that this could maintain symmetry and affect the field and acceleration differently.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about how the field lines behave around the dielectric and whether they remain parallel or change direction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the dielectric affects the electron's trajectory or the electric field inside the capacitor. Multiple competing views remain regarding the influence of the dielectric on the electron's path and the electric field configuration.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the uniformity of the electric field, the nature of the dielectric, and the specific configurations of the capacitor. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the electron's behavior in the presence of the dielectric.

kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! Assume that I have a parallel plate capacitor. If i place an electron close to the negative plate, it will move in a straight line (and accelerate) towards the positive plate. Now, assume that I place a neutral dielectric close to the electron trajectory (parallel to it), say at 1 mm away from its trajectory (so the electron is still traveling in vacuum). Will the electron trajectory be affected by the dielectric, or it will still travel in a straight line? And in case it is affected, is there any material/configuration I can use instead of the dielectric to have as little deviation as possible (I need to place some device inside 2 parallel plates, such that the field inside is as little as possible affected by that device)? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kelly0303 said:
Hello! Assume that I have a parallel plate capacitor. If i place an electron close to the negative plate, it will move in a straight line (and accelerate) towards the positive plate.
It will travel ALONG THE WIRE. If the wire is straight then you can call it a straight line. I think you are very confused, however, because you are assuming it will reach the positive plate. It will not, unless (1) the plates are touching, in which case you don't actually have a capacitor, you just have a wire that widens out at one point, or (2) your voltage is great enough to overcome the dielectric strength of air, given the distance between the plates, then you have dielectric breakdown and a spark. Otherwise, it will just accumulate on the negative plate (assuming the cap isn't already full charged).
Now, assume that I place a neutral dielectric close to the electron trajectory (parallel to it), say at 1 mm away from its trajectory (so the electron is still traveling in vacuum). Will the electron trajectory be affected by the dielectric, or it will still travel in a straight line?
Same issue as above. The introduction of a "neutral dialetric" does nothing to stop the electron from accumulating on the negative plate.
And in case it is affected, is there any material/configuration I can use instead of the dielectric to have as little deviation as possible (I need to place some device inside 2 parallel plates, such that the field inside is as little as possible affected by that device)? Thank you!
Since you only get the electrons to travel between the plates by cause a spark, this is really irrelevant.

The beginning of your post appears to be about electron flow while the end of the post apprears to be about the field between the plates. It's a good idea to better separate your questions.
 
phinds said:
It will travel ALONG THE WIRE. If the wire is straight then you can call it a straight line. I think you are very confused, however, because you are assuming it will reach the positive plate. It will not, unless (1) the plates are touching, in which case you don't actually have a capacitor, you just have a wire that widens out at one point, or (2) your voltage is great enough to overcome the dielectric strength of air, given the distance between the plates, then you have dielectric breakdown and a spark. Otherwise, it will just accumulate on the negative plate (assuming the cap isn't already full charged).
Same issue as above. The introduction of a "neutral dialetric" does nothing to stop the electron from accumulating on the negative plate.
Since you only get the electrons to travel between the plates by cause a spark, this is really irrelevant.

The beginning of your post appears to be about electron flow while the end of the post apprears to be about the field between the plates. It's a good idea to better separate your questions.
Thank you for your reply. I am not sure what you mean by the wire. I am talking about the space in between the 2 plates. There, we have an electric field so if we place an electron at a point in between the 2 plates, it will accelerate towards the positive plate (this is the basic principle used in particle accelerators). You can just ignore the existence of the plates completely and imagine an electron in a constant electric field. I mentioned the plates to have a concrete example. So my question is, if I place a dielectric close to the electron trajectory (which is a staright line in an uniform electric field), will the trajectory change, or will it still be a straight line?
 
kelly0303 said:
Thank you for your reply. I am not sure what you mean by the wire. I am talking about the space in between the 2 plates. There, we have an electric field so if we place an electron at a point in between the 2 plates
AH ... BETWEEN the plates. My whole comment was about an electron in one of the wires. Guess I really wasn't paying attention.
 
Last edited:
The field produced by the dielectric will be parallel to the field produced by the plates. It's a field induced by the plate field in the material comprising the dielectric. I don't think that it could effect the electron traveling outside the dielectric.
 
gneill said:
The field produced by the dielectric will be parallel to the field produced by the plates. It's a field induced by the plate field in the material comprising the dielectric. I don't think that it could effect the electron traveling outside the dielectric.
Thank you for this! I was mainly wondering if the field lines will still be parallel, or will they go inside and outside the dielectric (as it will have zero potential).
 
An improved model for the OP would probably be the electron traveling through a cylindrical hole inside the dielectric. In that case, the Field would be normal to the plates and ensure symmetry and the electron motion would be the same for identical Voltage and Separation (E = V/x). Introducing the dielectric when the supply was turned off would mean that the Q would be the same and Voltage would reduce (Q=CV) and so the Field and Acceleration would be less.
There are a host of alternatives to a question like this, depending on which variables are kept constant and which ones are changed.
 
kelly0303 said:
Hello! Assume that I have a parallel plate capacitor. If i place an electron close to the negative plate, it will move in a straight line (and accelerate) towards the positive plate. Now, assume that I place a neutral dielectric close to the electron trajectory (parallel to it), say at 1 mm away from its trajectory (so the electron is still traveling in vacuum). Will the electron trajectory be affected by the dielectric, or it will still travel in a straight line? And in case it is affected, is there any material/configuration I can use instead of the dielectric to have as little deviation as possible (I need to place some device inside 2 parallel plates, such that the field inside is as little as possible affected by that device)? Thank you!

Actually, the presence of the dielectric CAN produce a change in the field inside the capacitor. It depends on permitivitty of the dielectric. The electric field near the dielectric will bend.

We had a HW post a while back asking about something similar with a spherical dielectric:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/insulator-in-an-electric-field.843772/

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Actually, the presence of the dielectric CAN produce a change in the field inside the capacitor. It depends on permitivitty of the dielectric. The electric field near the dielectric will bend.

We had a HW post a while back asking about something similar with a spherical dielectric:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/insulator-in-an-electric-field.843772/

Zz.
Pretty sure that a rectangular slab of dielectric extending from plate-to-plate will not effect the field outside of it. All the field lines encountering the slab will be normal to it, and remain parallel. There won't be any surface charge expressed by dielectric activity along the path of the electron.
 
  • #10
gneill said:
Pretty sure that a rectangular slab of dielectric extending from plate-to-plate will not effect the field outside of it. All the field lines encountering the slab will be normal to it, and remain parallel. There won't be any surface charge expressed by dielectric activity along the path of the electron.

I don't see why the field lines can't bend. For example, if I half-filled the capacitor with a dielectric, so that there are field lines going from + to - electrodes of the capacitor just above the surface of the capacitor, wouldn't the induced polarization causes those field lines to bend and enter the dielectric, and thus, disrupting the field lines near it?

The electric field lines need not be normal to the surface for a dielectric, unlike a metal.

Zz.
 
  • #11
In the case of the spherical dielectric there are surface charges presented along the curved surface which can interact with the external field. In the figure from the quoted post:

1579967945297.png


note that the field line entering the "equator" of the sphere is undeflected.

For the plate capacitor all of the induced fields are parallel to the main field, and no surface charges appear along the sides of the dielectric (I've ignored fringe effects at the edges of the plates):

1579968192175.png
 
  • #12
But the fringe effects are likely the crux of the issue!
Can @kelly0303 please describe her proposed geometry and size specifications. In general there will be a nontrivial effect from the polarization charge.
 
  • #13
gneill said:
In the case of the spherical dielectric there are surface charges presented along the curved surface which can interact with the external field. In the figure from the quoted post:

View attachment 256095

note that the field line entering the "equator" of the sphere is undeflected.

For the plate capacitor all of the induced fields are parallel to the main field, and no surface charges appear along the sides of the dielectric (I've ignored fringe effects at the edges of the plates):

View attachment 256096

hutchphd said:
But the fringe effects are likely the crux of the issue!
Can @kelly0303 please describe her proposed geometry and size specifications. In general there will be a nontrivial effect from the polarization charge.

Yeah, I think that's where we differ because I do consider the sides and corners of the dielectric.

But there is another aspect here that hasn't been considered, and it isn't negligible, even though it may not be within the scope that the OP is thinking of: image charge. Even if the electron's path is parallel to the surface of the dielectric, there will always be an image charge in the dielectric, which will mess with the electron's trajectory.

This, and the creation of wakefield in the dielectric structure, are two phenomena that those of us working in dielectric-loaded accelerating structures in particle accelerators often have to deal with.

Zz.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: gneill and hutchphd
  • #14
ZapperZ said:
The electric field near the dielectric will bend.
hutchphd said:
But the fringe effects are likely the crux of the issue!
There are many links to this effect.
This one seems pretty rigorous and the diagram shows how the field near the edge is not normal to the plates. This will be present with or without a dielectric. Hence my suggestion that considering a hole through the dielectric would not involve an edge effect.
 
  • #15
I like @sophiecentaur 's suggesting of using a drilled hole. It should also mitigate the image charge issue as there will be equal images in the surrounding wall. Just be sure to center the electron's path in the hole.

I found an on-line java applet here that allows you to set up a configuration of charges, charged plates, charged conducting plates, dielectrics, and a host of other options. The resulting electric field lines are calculated and displayed to varying accuracy.

Here's an screen snip of what I set up:

1579982807573.png


The blue blocks are charged conducting planes. Positive on top, negative on the bottom. The brown blocks are dielectric material.

Here's the resulting electric field:

1579982875373.png


The simulator interface is a bit glitchy, like losing the distinctive material type colors at random (that's why you can't distinguish the dielectric from the plates in the above image). It is interesting to add dielectric bits one at a time and watch how the electric field alters.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and sophiecentaur
  • #16
Interestingly, the presence of a dielectric seems to mitigate the some of the edge effects (fringing) at the edges of the plates. Here's a run with the capacitor half-filled with dielectric material:

1579986180220.png


This time the interface didn't lose the material coloring.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
20K