CE BJT Amplifier - Collector Resistance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation and confusion surrounding the collector resistance (Ric) of a common emitter (CE) amplifier as presented in the textbook "Microelectronic Circuit Design." The key equation for Ric is highlighted as Ric = ro[1+gm(Re||r∏)], but a different version, Ric = ro(1+gm*Re), appears in summary tables without clear explanation of the transition. It is noted that the approximation assumes Re is much smaller than r∏, simplifying the equation. Additionally, it is emphasized that Ric should not exceed β*ro, highlighting the importance of understanding these approximations in the context of amplifier design. The discussion underscores the frustration with the lack of clarity in the text regarding these critical concepts.
hisotaso
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
We are studying single transistor amplifiers, and in the text where the collector resistance of the CE amplifier, Ric, is derived, the final equation is

Ric = ro[1+gm(Re||r∏)] (approximation)

This equation is highlighted and emphasized as something we should remember, then shown again in a large blue box on the next page as a "Design Note" (large emphasis in this text).

However in the table at the end of the section that summarizes the CE/CS amplifier design summary, and the big table at the end of the chapter that lists the design summary for all of the BJT amplifiers, the equation is given as

Ric = ro(1+gm*Re)

I have been looking for hours and there is nowhere that I can find where this transition takes place. The text is Microelectronic Circuit Design, 4th edition by Jaeger and Blalock. I am at a loss.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well they simply assume the Re<<r∏ so Re||r∏ ≈ Re

And sometime we use this version

Rci ≈ ro * (re + Re)/re

Where

re = 1/gm = 26mV/Ic

But Ric cannot be greater than Rci_max = β*ro for Common-base amplifier.
 
Thank you Jony130 for your reply. I apologizr for not being clearer, this is a common emitter amplifier (CE), I don't know if this makes a difference.

Also you have pointed out something that has been driving me crazy with this text, that is approximations are often made without explicitly stating so. This is frustrating when learning a new subject and not completely confident with the subject matter.
 
Simply you should always remember that if you use this equation
Ric = ro[1+gm(Re||r∏)]
If result is greater than β*ro your approximation equations tricks you. Because Ric can never exceed β*ro.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top