Celestial Mechanics: Earth Orbit Time & Why 80 Minutes is Impossible

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why an Earth satellite cannot complete an orbit in less than 80 minutes, with participants noting that higher altitudes result in longer orbital periods. The consensus suggests that achieving an orbit under 80 minutes would require overcoming significant energy expenditures and would likely place the satellite within the atmosphere, leading to rapid decay. The centrifugal force must equal gravitational force for stable orbits, and calculations indicate a minimum orbital period of about 84 minutes. Additionally, the atmospheric density at such heights would hinder satellite longevity. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of orbital mechanics and the practical limitations imposed by Earth's atmosphere.
a.a
Messages
126
Reaction score
0
The greater the altitude of an Earth satellite, the longer it takes to complete one orbit. Why is it impossible for any vehivle to go aroung Earth in less than 80 minutes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a homework question?
You have to at least try and answer it, describe what you know and any ideas you have about the solution
 
It's not impossible, but the energy expenditure would be ridiculous. If you're referring to ballistic orbits, I suspect that it's because an orbital period of less than 80 minutes would put the object inside the atmosphere. (Although, I haven't actually heard of that limit before.)

edit: Sorry, Mgb; didn't mean to step on your toes here. I started this response before seeing yours. It didn't occur to me that it might be a homework problem.
 
Last edited:
Because the centrifugal force would be greater than gravitational, unless you compensate it some other way. Computing this you get the minimal period something about 84 minutes.
 
Its not a homework question. It was a question that arose in class and I didnt really understand the explanation and as a result didnt take notes.

Im sorry michalll but i didnt quite get why the centrifugal force would be greater than the gravatational force.
 
michalll said:
Because the centrifugal force would be greater than gravitational, unless you compensate it some other way. Computing this you get the minimal period something about 84 minutes.

Surely the definition of an orbit is that centrifugal force equals the gravitational.

If you calculate the height necessary for an 84min orbit and compare it to the height of the atmosphere / density of the atmosphere at that height you will see why a satelite orbiting at that height isn't going to last long.

you could orbit the Earth at sea level if you had an air free pipe to avoid air resistance.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top