Cell is a Biochemical Computer: How Many Biologists Recognize It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter reasonmclucus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Computer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the cell as a biochemical computer with molecular memory, emphasizing that cells process inputs and produce outputs in a manner akin to computational functions. It highlights the unique arrangement of DNA bases, which allows for efficient information representation, similar to strategies considered in quantum computing. The conversation suggests that acknowledging the cell's computational nature could enhance understanding of its functions, including the role of "junk" DNA, which may serve as data statements for various instructions. While most biologists view cells as far more complex than computers, the dialogue recognizes that biological processes can perform computations. A research initiative in Amsterdam is mentioned, aiming to create a silicon cell to simulate chemical reactions, though capturing the true essence of living cells remains a challenge. Overall, the cell is portrayed as an advanced, intelligent machine, surpassing traditional electronic computers in its complexity and functionality.
reasonmclucus
Messages
197
Reaction score
0
How many biologists recognize that the cell is a biochemical computer with molecular memory? I don't mean it is similar to a computer or analogous to a computer. The cell is one design that might be chosen by someone building a molecular level self replicating computer, particularly for robotic applications.

The cell receives inputs,such as a protein, processes the inputs according to instructions in its memory and then produces a protein output. Biologists often think of the cell's memory, its chromosomes, as consisting of four bases and ignore the special way in which they are arranged. Each two bit "byte" consists of one of two sets of bases and one of the two members of the set will be in the "0 bit" position. This arrangment allows one bit to effectively represent two bits worth of information, a strategy also contemplated for quantum computers.

Recognizing that the cell is a computer would help understand how the cell functions and the role of those sections of DNA sometimes referred to as "junk" DNA. For example, some of this DNA might function as a "data statement" -- an area of information used as values for various instructions.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
A cell is not only a computer but an intelligent machine. It's internal programming (a typical human cell only expresses a small portion of its full genome) allows it to carry out specific function that a computer can only "dream" about. Most biologist will not compare a cell do a computer because a cell is way more complicated.
 
This is funny, because I remember back in grade school when I first encountered the functions of the cell. I was like, WOW this is exactly like a computer! And then as I grew older, now in university, I don't think that anymore. If anything, the computer is IMO a crappy model of the cell.
 
I agree with the comments so far, that the cell is a much more advanced computer in its synergy of processes compared to an electronic computer. However, I do understand reasonmclucus question. In slightly different wording, do biologists recognize that biological processes may be used to perform computations? Yes I do.
 
A research group in Amsterdam is trying to build a silicon cell. You input all the chemical reactions, after which you can do simulations with it. Ofcourse it will be hard to capture the true nature of a living cell.

http://www.bio.vu.nl/hwconf/Silicon/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
first impression differences, temporarily

cell shape is more flexible, less rigid, can't be taken apart and put back together as easily, most require constant power to survive, sometimes need computers help to survive although computers need cells help to survive.
Interesting thoughts.



Gil of surrealcity.com
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Back
Top