Center of Gravity & Mass: Dist for 2m Rod

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the distance between the center of gravity and the center of mass for a vertical rod of length 2 meters with a uniform mass distribution. The original poster presents the problem and attempts to conclude that the distance should be zero due to the uniform distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the relevance of the original poster's assertion regarding the equality of center of gravity and center of mass, suggesting that the uniformity of the gravitational field is a critical factor. Others introduce the idea that the center of mass and center of gravity may not coincide in non-uniform gravitational fields, prompting further exploration of the implications of gravity's variation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the definitions and conditions under which the center of mass and center of gravity may differ. There is no explicit consensus, as multiple perspectives are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential impact of the gravitational field's uniformity on the problem's outcome, suggesting that additional context regarding the course level and assumptions about gravity may be necessary for a complete understanding.

Ellen Liu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the distance between the center of gravity and the center of mass of a vertical rod of length 2 meters, and with a uniform mass distribution? (Center of gravity is defined like the center of mass with weight replacing mass in the formula).

Homework Equations


nothing

The Attempt at a Solution


the answer should be zero because it's uniform mass distributed.
Btw final tomorrow at 11:30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ellen Liu said:
the answer should be zero because it's uniform mass distributed.
Agree.
 
"Nothing" isn't very much of a relevant equation. The least you could come up with here is definitions of the center of mass and center of gravity in equation form. From there it's easy to see that the factor g that distinguishes the two can be brought outside a summation or integral in both numerator and denominator, so that it cancels and the two are shown to be equal.

The problem statement is weird: the mass distribution doesn't matter. The fact that the gravity field is uniform matters. And that isn't even stated. See hyperphysics

Good luck in the final :smile: !
 
Generally speaking, center of mass and center of gravity are not in the same location, even with uniform mass distributions (assuming a non-uniform gravity field). This is because gravity pulls harder on things that are closer to the attracting body. So for the case of a vertical rod, the "bottom" end of the rod will be pulled harder by the gravitational force. Obviously the CoM is the center of the rod. Think about this:
## df = \mu Mdm/r^2 ##
You know the total force acts on the CG:
## F = \mu Mm/r_{CG}^2 ##
Then, set up the integral in terms of dr, a length element of the rod:
## F = \int \mu Mdm/r_{CG}^2 = \int \mu Mmdr/(lr^2) ##
Evaluate the integral and compare to the known expression of the total force.
 
Last edited:
Agree with Sunny. So now we have to ask Ellen how the final went, and whether the context (level of the course) justifies taking the non-uniformity of the gravity field into consideration. To introduce this kind of detail necessitates knowledge of that field: the answer then depends on where you are wrt its sources (in deep space: COM still = center of gravity, or: COM exists, COG does not ?)
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K