Center of mass triangle problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the center of mass (CM) for a pentagon with one triangle missing and a uniform square with one quadrant missing. It emphasizes that the CM will lie along the line of symmetry, specifically the y-axis. To find the y-coordinate of the combined CM of the remaining triangles, moments of mass about the x-axis must be considered. The total mass is determined by the area of the shapes, allowing for simplification in calculations. Additionally, it is noted that finding the CM of the quadrant of a circle is more straightforward, with a specific location given as 2/3R from the sharp point.
nicholas1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
After finding the center of mass of a pentagon with five equal sides a but one triangle missing, then iam asked to find the CM of uniform square a with one quadrant missing.
I dont' really grab the idea of CM, please help..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wellcome to PF nicholas.

First note that the com will lie along the line of symmetry. This means it will be located along the line through the middle of the pentagon and dividing the missing triangle in half, let's call this line the y-axis. This means that you need to locate the y-coordinate of the combined com of the four triangles along the axis.

To locate the y-coordinate of the combined com of the four triangles you need to take the moments of mass of the com of each of the triangles about a line perpendicular to the y-axis. Let's call it the x-axis. Position it at the base of the pentagon.

For the mass of the coms, and total mass, you just need to consider only the total area of the shape in the moment calculations (that is you assume that the mass can be found by multiplying the area by some constant).

Use the fact that the sum of the mass moments of the coms of the four triangles about the x-axis need to be equal to the moment of the combined com (total area of the four triangles times \bar{y}) about your x-axis- it is in this equation that the above mentioned constant will cancel out.

The circle with one quadrant is actually much easier! Can you proof that the com of one quadrant is located \frac{2}{3}R up from the sharp point?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top