Center of Mass Velocity in Multiple Dimmensions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the calculation of Center of Mass Velocity (VCM) in multiple dimensions, specifically in the x and y directions. The formula VCM = (M1V1 + M2V2) / Mtotal is highlighted, but confusion arises regarding how to determine VCM for individual dimensions. It is clarified that VCM is a vector quantity, meaning it must account for the contributions of each object's mass and velocity in their respective directions. The misconception that the VCM for the x-direction should equal the velocity of the moving object is addressed, emphasizing the need to consider momentum and mass distribution. Understanding that velocity is a vector is crucial for correctly calculating VCM in different dimensions.
tummbacoco
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I was doing some practice problems to become more familiar with the Center of Mass Velocity and I came across this one from (Noted in the picture) Engineering at Illinois, that relates the velocity of the center of mass in both the x and y direction, however I don't quit understand the answer.

VCM = (M1V1 + M2V2)/ Mtotal

Since this is the case VCM should equal 2.4, but the question asked for the velocity in the x and y direction

Since only one object is moving in the x-direction shouldn't that be the VCM for the x-direction??
Why would VCM (x-direction) = Momentum in the x-direction? How would one go about calculating VCM for individual dimensions? Thanks!
TOb7p.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tummbacoco said:
Since only one object is moving in the x-direction shouldn't that be the VCM for the x-direction??
No. As you see in the formula,
tummbacoco said:
VCM = (M1V1 + M2V2)/ Mtotal
There are factors ##m_1/m_{\rm total}## and ##m_2/m_{\rm total}##

tummbacoco said:
Why would VCM (x-direction) = Momentum in the x-direction?
It isn't. ##v_{\rm} \;m_{\rm total} ## is the momentum.
 
tummbacoco said:
How would one go about calculating VCM for individual dimensions?
The easiest way to do it is to remember that velocity is a vector, which you seem to have forgotten when you got your 2.4m/s answer.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top