Centrifugal Pump: Suction & Discharge Line Bypass

  • Thread starter Thread starter ismat143
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centrifugal Pump
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of bypassing both the suction and discharge lines of a centrifugal pump. Bypassing water from the discharge line back to the suction line can lead to overheating due to recirculation, as it introduces turbulence and adds thermal energy to the fluid. Alternatives for managing high discharge pressure include using a Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) for better energy efficiency or installing a bypass with a control valve that directs flow back to the tank. It is emphasized that recirculating to the suction line is inefficient and can waste energy. Proper management of the system is crucial to avoid overheating and ensure optimal pump performance.
ismat143
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Please refer the drawing and let me know what happens if the pump suction and discharge line bypass together.

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Centrifugal pump.jpg
    Centrifugal pump.jpg
    9.7 KB · Views: 699
Engineering news on Phys.org
What does 'pump suction and discharge line bypass together' mean? Are you talking about isolating the pump from the suction and discharge simultaneously?
 
Thanks for reply,

To reduce pressure/flow from the pump, it is ok to circulate/pass water from discharge line(@ 7-8 bar pressure) to suction line?
 
This happens pretty frequently, though it's a terrible waste of power.

If your pump is discharging at too high a pressure you've got a few options:

1) VFD. Pro: It's very good at running your pump on different curves, and they save on operating costs (as you waste less energy by pumping a lot of water that you aren't using). Con: More expensive than some mechanical workarounds depending on the size of the pump. They're pretty darn cheap for an 18.5 kW motor though.

2) Bypass with control valve would be the second option if flow control is required in the recirculating line. An orifice plate would be best if you are just sizing the line for minimum continuous flow requirement. This line should go back to the tank, not the suction line.

Piping back to the suction line causes the heat added to the water during the pumping process to be recirculated and will eventually cause overheating if the volume of recirculated water is high enough in volume compared to the tank water. You are also introducing a lot of turbulence into the suction line which is typically undesirable (unless you are designing for that purpose, like in specially designed froth pumping systems).

If you can't do a VFD, then I'd suggest installing the recirc line back to the tank, rather than to the suction side of the pump, closed loop pumping in CF pumps isn't good for them and wastes energy. Is the pump oversized, or is this for intermittent use?
 
Last edited:
Note also that you are putting energy into the fluid so if you recirculate for an extended period of time, that energy builds up as thermal energy in the liquid and temperature rises. The temperature the liquid rises to can be determined by calculating the heat transfer out of the fluid, through convective heat transfer for example. The work in will equal heat transfer out under steady state. So if you do this, expect the water to heat up over time. You may need additional cooling for the recirculated water if there isn't enough heat transfer.
 
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top