Centripetal Force: Calculating Bank Angle for Plane Circling Airport

AI Thread Summary
To determine the bank angle for a plane circling an airport at a radius of 2100m and a speed of 400km/h, the lift must be perpendicular to the wings to prevent sideways slipping. The equation arctan(v^2/rg) is suggested for calculating the angle, but there are issues with unit conversions and calculations. The speed must be converted from km/h to m/s, resulting in approximately 111.11 m/s. Despite attempts to apply the equation, results indicate an incorrect angle of 90 degrees, suggesting a miscalculation in the process. Clarification on the correct use of the formula and unit conversions is needed to resolve the discrepancies.
pats6
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


As your plane circles an airport, it moves in a horizontal circle of radius 2100m with a speed of 400km/h. If the lift of the airplane's wings is perpendicular to the wings, at what angle should the plane be banked so that it doesn't tend to slip sideways

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So what are your thoughts on how to solve it?
 
i do not know i tried to draw a diagram for the problem and when i worked the problem out i got a really small number
 
i know that i need to find the horizontal lift components but I am not sure how
 
If the plane is in equilibrium - flying in a circle - what do you know that must be balanced that will keep it from slipping sideways?
 
I should be able to use arctan(v^2/rg) to give me the angle
when i plug the numbers in i get arctan(400^2/9.8*2100)=90
and that is not the right
 
400km/h = ? m/s?
 
400km/h= 1.1*10^-4
When i plugged it into the equation I got 3.3*10^-11 I don't think this is right because that angle is to small. Can u tell me what I am doing wrong.
arctan((1.1*10^-4)^2/(9.8)(2100)
 
Gee, I get 111 m/s

400,000/3600 = 111.1111
 
  • #10
ok i used that and i get 90 degrees when i put it in as an answer it is declined I am i still doing something wrong
 
  • #11
I really think you need to recalculate your tan-1.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top