Centripetal Force: Distance b/w Centers or Surfaces?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of centripetal force in the context of a lab problem involving a doghouse in orbit around the Earth. Participants are exploring the correct interpretation of the radius used in the centripetal force equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning whether the radius 'r' in the centripetal force equation should be the distance between the centers of the two masses or the distance between their surfaces. There is also discussion about the significance of the radius of the doghouse in relation to the radius of the Earth and the distance between the two objects.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that the radius of the doghouse is negligible compared to the radius of the Earth and the distance involved, indicating a potential direction for resolving the radius question. Others are exploring the implications of using the distance between the centers of mass in their calculations.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions constraints related to not being able to provide the full text of the problem due to lab rules, which may affect the clarity of the discussion. The problem involves specific values for mass and distance, but the radius of the doghouse is not provided.

BassMaster
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
When doing problems involving centripetal force, using the equation:

F = mv^2/r ,

is r the distance between the centers of the two masses or is it the distance between the surfaces?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I am not mistaken, it refers to the distance between the centers of mass of the two objects.
 
It is between the centers of the objects.
 
Okay, but here's my problem. I'm given the radius of the Earth (one of the masses), but not the radius of the doghouse (the other mass). I AM given the distance between the two objects. So is radius of the doghouse so small that it is insignificant?

If so, do I just add the radius of the Earth and the distance between the doghouse and the Earth for the value of 'r'?
 
Can you give me the full text for the problem? But I will think that it is.
 
It's for a lab so I can't write it exactly as it is or it will make no sense. I'll try my best:

A doghouse has a mass of 150 kg. The mass of the Earth is 5.98 x 10^24 kg. The radius of the Earth is 6.28 x 10^8 m. What is the kinetic energy of the doghouse in orbit at 500 km above the earth?

I'm assuming you do Fg=Fc (force of gravity = centripetal force) because the object is in orbit. So mg=mv^2/r.

Solve for the speed, and then use that in the equation Ek = 0.5mv^2

Once again, my only problem is that I don't know whether to include the radius of the Earth in 'r', especially because the radius of the doghouse isn't given.
 
BassMaster said:
It's for a lab so I can't write it exactly as it is or it will make no sense. I'll try my best:

A doghouse has a mass of 150 kg. The mass of the Earth is 5.98 x 10^24 kg. The radius of the Earth is 6.28 x 10^8 m. What is the kinetic energy of the doghouse in orbit at 500 km above the earth?

I'm assuming you do Fg=Fc (force of gravity = centripetal force) because the object is in orbit. So mg=mv^2/r.

Solve for the speed, and then use that in the equation Ek = 0.5mv^2

Once again, my only problem is that I don't know whether to include the radius of the Earth in 'r', especially because the radius of the doghouse isn't given.

A doghouse in orbit above the earth? Sounds a bit weird! Anyway, like you suggest, the radius of the doghouse won't matter as it is neglibile compared to the other two distances. You will need to include the radius of the Earth though!
 
just as you do it, and yes the radius of the doghouse is insignificant.
 
Alright, thanks a lot guys.
 
  • #10
no prob. someday it will be your turn to help me.
 
  • #11
Oh, one more thing. The next question is asking:

A dog rocketed over to the moon and landed there. What escape velocity (from the surface of the moon) did the dog need for his return trip to Earth?


Do you just use the equation for escape velocity or is there some trick to this question? Because isn't escape velocity the minimum speed required to escape the gravitational field, but doesn't the dog also have to return to earth?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K