Centripetal Force (Horizontally Banked Question)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving centripetal force and friction on a banked curve. The scenario describes a car navigating a curve with a specified radius and speed, and participants are tasked with determining the coefficient of friction required to prevent skidding at a higher speed.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to calculate the angle of the banked curve and the corresponding coefficient of friction using equations of motion and forces. There is a focus on the relationship between speed, banking angle, and friction.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their calculations, leading to different results for the angle and coefficient of friction. Some express uncertainty about their methods, while others suggest alternative approaches or corrections to the original calculations. The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering the reaction force at different speeds and the potential impact of rounding in calculations. There is also mention of the need for free body diagrams to visualize the forces involved.

McKeavey
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a curve with a radius of 60m is properly banked for a car traveling at 60km/h (16.66m/s) with no friction, what must be the coefficient of friction if the car is not to skid when traveling at 90km/h (25m/s)


Homework Equations


mac = mv^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is 0.39

First we need to find the angle, so since it said that when the speed was 60km/h, there is No friction, we can make this equation.. and do the following calculations
Fgx = mac
mgsinɵ = mv^2/r
gsinɵ = v^2/r
9.8sinɵ = 16.66^2/60
sinɵ = 4.625/9.8
ɵ = 28.16

So now we have the angle..
We can now use the speed 90km/h with our new angle.
So the new equation is..
Ff + Fgx = mv^2/r
μFn + Fgx = mv^2/r
μmgcos28 + mgsin28 = mv^2/r
μ9.8cos28 + 9.8sin28 = (25)^2/60
μ(8.65) + 4.6 = 10.41
μ = 10.41 - 4.6/8.65
μ = 0.67

So I'm not sure where I went wrong..
the answer is 0.39 :O
 
Physics news on Phys.org
McKeavey said:

Homework Statement


If a curve with a radius of 60m is properly banked for a car traveling at 60km/h (16.66m/s) with no friction, what must be the coefficient of friction if the car is not to skid when traveling at 90km/h (25m/s)


Homework Equations


mac = mv^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is 0.39

First we need to find the angle, so since it said that when the speed was 60km/h, there is No friction, we can make this equation.. and do the following calculations
Fgx = mac
mgsinɵ = mv^2/r
gsinɵ = v^2/r
9.8sinɵ = 16.66^2/60
sinɵ = 4.625/9.8
ɵ = 28.16

So now we have the angle..
We can now use the speed 90km/h with our new angle.
So the new equation is..
Ff + Fgx = mv^2/r
μFn + Fgx = mv^2/r
μmgcos28 + mgsin28 = mv^2/r
μ9.8cos28 + 9.8sin28 = (25)^2/60
μ(8.65) + 4.6 = 10.41
μ = 10.41 - 4.6/8.65
μ = 0.67

So I'm not sure where I went wrong..
the answer is 0.39 :O

You will be familiar with the idea that when you drive through a dip in the road, you feel heavier. This is because when you move through the dip, the reaction force is larger than just mg.
A similar thing happens when you drive round a banked turn. The reaction force is stronger than when the vehicle is parked on the banked turn.
The net result is that your second line : mgsinɵ = mv2/r
should actually have been : mgtanɵ = mv2/r
 
Hmm I got angle as 25.24.
And then the resulting coefficient of friction as 0.59 :S

By the way thanks for the other thread, I got the right answer for it ^^
Now..To finish this.. :(
 
McKeavey said:
Hmm I got angle as 25.24.
And then the resulting coefficient of friction as 0.59 :S

By the way thanks for the other thread, I got the right answer for it ^^
Now..To finish this.. :(

By rounding off your 60 kph conversion you get angle 25.24. I didn't round, and got 25.28657. Only a slight difference, but it may make a difference.

I hope you took into account the fact that at 90 kph, the Reaction force is even greater than it is at 60 kph.

Draw a free body diagram and you will [hopefully] see how much bigger.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K