Centripetal Force - trying to find time

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a physicist standing on a rotating platform, holding a weight that hangs at an angle due to the centripetal force acting on it. The goal is to determine the speed of the physicist at the moment the weight makes a 10° angle with the vertical.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss drawing free-body diagrams and analyzing the components of forces acting on the weight. There are questions about the cancellation of forces and the correct setup of equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on breaking down the forces into components and suggested using Newton's second law. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the setup of the equations, and some participants are exploring different approaches to relate the tension in the string to the centripetal acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of not having specific values for mass or acceleration, which complicates the calculations. There is also mention of the angle of the weight being 10° from the vertical, which is critical to the problem setup.

cdornz
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A physicist is standing 10 feet from the center of a platform that can rotate about a vertical axis - the platform is horizontal. She is holding a weight that is hanging freely from a string. The platform starts rotating and eventually she notices that the weight is no longer hanging straight down but is making an angle of 10° with the vertical. How fast is she moving at that time?


Homework Equations


Normally, for centripetal equations I would use a=v2/R
I've also used the equation Fcentripetal=4∏2Mf2R


The Attempt at a Solution


I've never had to solve a centripetal force equation with knowing the mass of either the person or the weight or without a velocity. I'm honestly not quite sure what route to go to solve this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a free-body diagram for the weight.
Once you take x- and y-components, you should be able to cancel the mass out.
 
So I'm not sure if I drew this correctly or not, but drawing out the free body diagram for the weight, would those components cancel out with the tension of the string?
 
It should be clear from your diagram that the y-component of the tension cancels out the weight.
The x-component of the tension will be the only horizontal force on the object - this provides the centripetal force.

Have you written out the components? They should simplify down to a simple expression.
 
For components, I would have:

Ftension; the y-component pointing upwards canceled out with the weight of the mass pointing downwards. There is no Ffriction since the object is in the air. Otherwise, I'm not sure what other forces.

I could be going about this completely wrong, but from other examples I had, I used force equations such as

\SigmaFx = Fnet
Ftension = ma

Problem I run into with this, is that I don't have a way of calculating the mass or the acceleration. All I know is that the angle of the mass is 280° from the +x axis.
 
So, for the y-components, you have
Tcos(10°) - mg = 0
→ Tcos(10°) = mg

and for the x-components,
Tsin(10°) = ma
where a is the centripetal acceleration

(your components may be slightly different depending on your axes)

If you insert the expression for centripetal acceleration and combine these 2 equations, you can get rid of T and m.
 
Sneaky approach:

If you consider the string and weight to be stationary in a rotating frame of reference (think of taking a snapshot of the rotating platform at some instant of time when you have a profile view of the happenings) then it becomes fair to speak about centrifugal forces and accelerations in that frame of reference. It turns out that these centrifugal effects have the same magnitude but opposite direction to our usual centripetal ones. Then, using Newton's second law f = ma, we can drop the constant m's and label a diagram with accelerations rather than forces:

attachment.php?attachmentid=54009&stc=1&d=1355762164.gif


Does this give you any ideas about solving for ac?
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    2 KB · Views: 612
ap123 said:
So, for the y-components, you have
Tcos(10°) - mg = 0
→ Tcos(10°) = mg

and for the x-components,
Tsin(10°) = ma
where a is the centripetal acceleration

(your components may be slightly different depending on your axes)

If you insert the expression for centripetal acceleration and combine these 2 equations, you can get rid of T and m.

So I went with this and worked with the axes a bit to make it make more sense to me. I ended up with this as a result:

\SigmaFx=max
Tx+(mg)x = max
T(cos100°) +mg(cos270°) = ma(cos180°)
T(cos100°) = -ma
T(cos100°) = -mv2/R

T(sin100°) - mg = 0
T(sin100°)/g = m

T(cos100°) = -T(sin100°)/g * v2/R

My final equation was v2 = (T(cos100°))gR/-T(sin100°)
v2= -55.56t/-0.98t = 56.47 which I then took the square root of and so the velocity ended up being 7.51ft/s.

Did I go about this correctly?
 
Your final answer agrees with mine :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K