Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm not very "hip" with how accurate current experimental techniques are at distance scales less then that of the proton's size, but I am wondering about how strong our current theoretical tools are (and assumed to be) at smaller scales. I know we are searching for a quantum theory of gravity that is assumed to come into play at distance scales [itex]\approx 10^{-34}\text{m}[/itex], but looking at that number, it is outrageously small.

So small, that it seems to me there is as much "space" between the size of a proton and that length scale, as there is between our solar system and the proton size. Clearly physics as we know it changes dramatically between solar system dynamics, and atomic physics, are we possibly jumping the gun looking for unified theories etc... when we have so much "distance" still to cover? Another example, LQG displays that it can remain UV-finite even while coupling to a fermion field, yet, is there reason to believe that the fermion field physics remains the same in a domain nineteen orders of magnitude smaller then where it is found successful?

Thanks in advance,

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Challenges of very high energy physics

Loading...

Similar Threads - Challenges very high | Date |
---|---|

B Some very basic questions around the double slit experiment | Sep 25, 2017 |

A What's Your Answer To Dyson's Challenge | Jun 11, 2017 |

A Challenges to QED from hyperfine measurements | May 20, 2017 |

A Quantum challenge: mathematical paradoxes | Apr 22, 2016 |

Dr. Chinese's Challenge | Mar 9, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**