Change in entropy, Gibbs and Helmholtz in an isothermal compression

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 34K views
T-7
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the change in the entropy, Helmholtz free energy, and Gibbs free energy, when a mole of ideal gas is compressed from 1atm to 100atm at 20C.

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not entirely convinced by my attempt below -- can anyone spot something wrong? (I thought it odd that the entropy change should be temperature-independent...)

From the first law

[tex]dU = dQ - dW = dQ - PdV[/tex]

From the second law,

[tex]dS = dQ / T \Rightarrow dQ = TdS[/tex]

Thus:

[tex]dU = TdS - PdV[/tex]

Transposing to get dS:

[tex]dS = \frac{dU}{T} + \frac{P}{T}dV[/tex]

But the compression takes place at 20C => isothermal => dT = 0 => dU = 0. Thus:

[tex]dS = \frac{P}{T}dV[/tex]

From the ideal gas law,

[tex]PV = RT \Rightarrow V = \frac{RT}{P} \Rightarrow dV = -\frac{RT}{P^{2}}dP[/tex]

Thus:

[tex]dS = -R\frac{dP}{P} \Rightarrow \Delta S = Rln(P_{1}/P_{2})[/tex]

For the Helmholtz free energy, I reason:

[tex]dF = -SdT - PdV[/tex]

isothermal => dT = 0. Thus:

[tex]dF = -PdV[/tex]

Again, using the ideal gas law, rewrite as:

[tex]dF = RT\frac{dP}{P} \Rightarrow \Delta S = RTln(P_{2}/P_{1})[/tex]

And finally, for the Gibbs Free energy, I reason:

[tex]dG = -SdT + VdP = VdP = \frac{RT}{P}dP[/tex]

So, in this case, [tex]\Delta G = \Delta F[/tex]

Is this the right approach?

Cheers!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I took a slightly different approach which otherwise parallels yours and got the same result. If we start from

[tex]PV = RT[/tex] , with T constant, and differentiate, we have

[tex]P dV + V dP = 0 \Rightarrow P dV = - V dP[/tex].

For an isothermal process,

[tex]dU = dQ - PdV = 0 \Rightarrow dQ = P dV = -V dP[/tex] ,

so we can write

[tex]dS = dQ / T = -(V dP/T) = -(RT/PT) dP = - R (dP/P)[/tex] ,

using the ideal gas law. This yields the result you found,

[tex]\Delta S = R ln(P_{1}/P_{2})[/tex] .

If we start from the definitions for the free energies,

[tex]F = U - TS[/tex] and [tex]G = U + PV - TS[/tex] and differentiate, we have

[tex]dF = dU - T dS - S dT[/tex] and

[tex]dG = dU + P dV + V dP - T dS - S dT[/tex].

If we strip away all the terms equal to zero for an isothermal process (dU = 0 , dT = 0), these reduce to

[tex]dF = - T dS[/tex] and [tex]dG = P dV + V dP - T dS[/tex] ;

but, as we showed above, [tex]P dV + V dP = 0[/tex] , so

[tex]dF = - T dS = dG[/tex] .

Thus, applying our result for [tex]\Delta S[/tex],

[tex]\Delta F = \Delta G = RT ln(P_{2}/P_{1})[/tex].

[Almost missed that: the signs flip again going from dS to dF or dG, so the order of the integration limits doesn't reverse this time...]

I suppose that, given the definitions of what F and G are (see Wiki, for instance), it perhaps isn't surprising that [tex]\Delta F[/tex] and [tex]\Delta G[/tex] are the same for this process.
 
Last edited: