Change in entropy in an isolated system

Jenkz
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive an equation for the change in entropy that occurs in an isolated (micro-canonical) system containing N particles, if an adiabatic expansion from volume V1 to volume V1 takes place. Show that the number of microstates is given by V^N.

Homework Equations



Entropy S = K_{b} ln \Omega
Where \Omega is multiplicity, the number of microstates for distinguishable partciles= N!/\Pi_{i}n_{j}!

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok I'm not too sure where to start. I know that dQ = 0 as this is an adiabatic expansion.
Meaning dU = dW = - NK_{b}T ln (V2/V1), but I'm not sure if this helps anything.

I also know that a microcanonical system is thermally isolated and has a fixed N. So would thermally isolated mean dT = 0? in which case dU = 0 ... confused.

please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thermally isolated, so Q=0, means all the Work goes into changing the Temperature.
How much Work is done during an adiabatic expansion? (as a function of Volumes)
 
Is my answer in my first post incorrect?

"I know that dQ = 0 as this is an adiabatic expansion.
Meaning dU = dW = - NKbT ln (V2/V1)"

as dU= dW = (integrating from V1 to V2) - pdV
where P = NKbT / V
 
Thermally isolated means no heat enters or leaves, thus the expansion will change the temperature.
 
Ok thanks, but I still don't understand how what to do for this question. :S
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top