Change in Entropy of surroundings for irreversible process

AI Thread Summary
The equation ΔSsurroundings = -Qirr/T is valid for irreversible processes because it assumes the surroundings act as a thermal reservoir, maintaining a constant temperature during heat exchange. This condition allows for the calculation of entropy change using the reversible process equation, despite the irreversibility of the system itself. The uniform temperature of the reservoir ensures that there are no significant temperature gradients, which could complicate the analysis. Additionally, using a mixture of liquid and solid at the melting point can help achieve this uniformity in real-world scenarios. Thus, the approach effectively simplifies the analysis of entropy changes in irreversible processes.
dhtikna
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I know that the equation ΔSsystem = Q/T is only valid for a reversible process but whenever i see problems involving a irreversible isothermal expansion of ideal gas, the ΔSsurroundings is taken as -Qirr/T. Why is that equation valid for surroundings, is it because the surroundings being a reservoir/sink, any heat exchange is done reversibly?


Homework Equations



ΔSsystem = Q/T
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dhtikna said:

Homework Statement


I know that the equation ΔSsystem = Q/T is only valid for a reversible process but whenever i see problems involving a irreversible isothermal expansion of ideal gas, the ΔSsurroundings is taken as -Qirr/T. Why is that equation valid for surroundings, is it because the surroundings being a reservoir/sink, any heat exchange is done reversibly?


Homework Equations



ΔSsystem = Q/T
This assumes that there are no significant temperature gradients present within the reservoir (so that the temperature of the entire reservoir is uniform) and that the reservoir temperature remains constant during the process. This can be approached in the real world by having the material in the reservoir consist of a mixture of liquid and solid at the melting point.

Chet
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top