Change in orbit due to moment of inertia change?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of the Three Gorges Dam on Earth's moment of inertia, leading to a slight increase in the length of days by 60 nanoseconds. Participants express that this change will not affect Earth's orbit around the Sun, as it does not alter the planet's mass or its distance from the Sun. The negligible effect on tidal locking between Earth and the Sun is also noted, given the vast distance involved. Overall, the consensus is that while the change in day length is interesting, it has no significant implications for Earth's orbital dynamics. The conversation highlights the minimal physical effects of such changes on a planetary scale.
DrBwts
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,

So recently I read about the massive 3 gorges dam changing the mass moment of inertia of the Earth to such an extent that the days will now be 60ns longer.

Then I thought, how will this effect the orbit of the Earth about the Sun?

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wow! A whole 60 ns longer each day! Man, I can catch some additional zzzs every morning!

I wouldn't worry about any orbital changes w.r.t. the Earth's movement about the sun.

BTW, in 60 ns, a beam of light travels about 18 meters.

It would also take over 160 million years to add an additional HOUR to each day.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
DrBwts said:
Then I thought, how will this effect the orbit of the Earth about the Sun?
It won't. It hasn't changed the Earth's mass one iota, nor has it changed the distance between the Earth's center of mass and the Sun.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
what about tidal locking effects between the Earth and the sun? I guess it is negligibly small, since the size of the Earth and sun is very small compared to the distance between them.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top